The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation between MR Imaging and Pathologic Findings
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of "triple-negative" breast cancer (ie, cancer that is estrogen receptor [ER] negative, progesterone receptor [PR] negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] negative) and to compare them with those of breast cancers that are ER positive, PR positive, and HER2 negative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. The MR imaging findings in 176 randomly assigned women (mean age, 56 years; range, 29-87 years) with surgically confirmed triple-negative breast cancers (n = 59) or ER-positive/PR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers (n = 117) were reviewed. MR imaging findings included tumor shape, margin, internal enhancement, and size, as well as intratumoral signal intensity that was stronger than or almost the same as that of water or vessels on T2-weighted MR images. The MR imaging findings were compared with the pathologic findings. RESULTS: High histologic grade (P < .001), unifocal lesion (P = .012), mass lesion type (P < .001), smooth mass margin (P = .001), rim enhancement (P < .001), persistent enhancement pattern (P = .005), and very high intratumoral signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (P = .002) were significantly associated with triple-negative breast cancer. Very high intratumoral signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images was significantly associated with intratumoral necrosis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Several MR imaging features might be used for detecting triple-negative breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J. R., Ross, D. T., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L. A., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,261
Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence
Dent, R., Trudeau, M., Pritchard, K. I., Hanna, W. M., Kahn, H. K., Sawka, C. A., Lickley, L. A., Rawlinson, E., Sun, P., & Narod, S. A. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-3045 · Cited by 5,091
Bauer, K. R., Brown, M., Cress, R. D., Parise, C. A., & Caggiano, V. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22618 · Cited by 2,067
Cheang, M. C. U., Voduc, D., Bajdik, C., Leung, S., McKinney, S., Chia, S. K., Perou, C. M., & Nielsen, T. O. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1658 · Cited by 1,195
Basal-Like Breast Cancer: A Critical Review
Rakha, E. A., Reis-Filho, J. S., & Ellis, I. O. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.13.1748 · Cited by 1,164
Haffty, B. G., Yang, Q., Reiss, M., Kearney, T., Higgins, S. A., Weidhaas, J., Harris, L., Hait, W., & Toppmeyer, D. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.5664 · Cited by 1,084
Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma
Livasy, C. A., Karaca, G., Nanda, R., Tretiakova, M. S., Olopade, O. I., Moore, D. T., & Perou, C. M. (2006) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800528 · Cited by 1,063
Triple negative tumours: a critical review
Reis‐Filho, J. S., & Tutt, A. N. J. (2008) · Histopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02889.x · Cited by 884
Houssami, N., Ciatto, S., Macaskill, P., Lord, S. J., Warren, R. M., Dixon, J. M., & Irwig, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.2108 · Cited by 831
Leek, R. D., Landers, R. J., Harris, A. L., & Lewis, C. E. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690158 · Cited by 451
Cited by
An overview of triple-negative breast cancer
Kumar, P., & Aggarwal, R. (2016) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3859-y · Cited by 771
Triple-negative breast cancer—current status and future directions
Gluz, O., Liedtke, C., Gottschalk, N., Pusztai, L., Nitz, U., & Harbeck, N. (2009) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp492 · Cited by 687
Loo, C. E., Straver, M. E., Rodenhuis, S., Muller, S. H., Wesseling, J., Vrancken Peeters, M.-J. T. F. D., & Gilhuijs, K. G. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.31.1258 · Cited by 304
Triple‐negative breast cancer: Present challenges and new perspectives
Podo, F., Buydens, L. M. C., Degani, H., Hilhorst, R., Klipp, E., Gribbestad, I. S., Van Huffel, S., W.M. van Laarhoven, H., Luts, J., Monleon, D., et al. (2010) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2010.04.006 · Cited by 299
Mohammed, R. A. A., Ellis, I. O., Mahmmod, A. M., Hawkes, E. C., Green, A. R., Rakha, E. A., & Martin, S. G. (2011) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2011.4 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Uematsu, T., Kasami, M., & Yuen, S.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 250
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 638-647
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2100240570
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation between MR Imaging and Pathologic Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2503081054
- The paper
- Uematsu, T., Kasami, M., & Yuen, S. (2009). Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation between MR Imaging and Pathologic Findings. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503081054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
