Cited by 5,091Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasCancer Risks and Factors

Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence

Open access
Dent, Rebecca, Trudeau, Maureen, Pritchard, Kathleen I., Hanna, Wedad M., Kahn, Harriet K., Sawka, Carol A., Lickley, Lavina A., Rawlinson, Ellen +2 more·2007·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical features, natural history, and outcomes for women with "triple-negative" breast cancer with women with other types of breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We studied a cohort of 1,601 patients with breast cancer, diagnosed between January 1987 and December 1997 at Women's College Hospital in Toronto. Triple-negative breast cancers were defined as those that were estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, and HER2neu negative. The prognostic significance of triple-negative breast cancer was explored. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the 1,601 women was 8.1 years. One hundred and eighty of 1,601 patients (11.2%) had triple-negative breast cancer. Compared with other women with breast cancer, those with triple-negative breast cancer had an increased likelihood of distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-3.5; P < 0.0001) and death (hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.5; P < 0.001) within 5 years of diagnosis but not thereafter. The pattern of recurrence was also qualitatively different; among the triple-negative group, the risk of distant recurrence peaked at approximately 3 years and declined rapidly thereafter. Among the "other" group, the recurrence risk seemed to be constant over the period of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Triple-negative breast cancers have a more aggressive clinical course than other forms of breast cancer, but the adverse effect is transient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-3045

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Foulkes WD, Steffansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1mutations and a basal epithelial phe- notype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95: 1482 ^5.
  2. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer LR, et al. The triple neg- ative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of the basal-like breast cancer phenotype. Breast Cancer ResTreat 2004;80:1023.
  3. Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, et al. Predic- tion of BRCA1status in patients with breast cancer us- ing estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5175 ^80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dent, R., Trudeau, M., Pritchard, K. I., Hanna, W. M., Kahn, H. K., Sawka, C. A., Lickley, L. A., Rawlinson, E., Sun, P., & Narod, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
13
Issue
15
Pages
4429-4434
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2170602872
Cited by
5,091
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 244 · 2025: 316 · 2024: 350 · 2023: 417 · 2022: 424 · 2021: 451 · 2020: 391 · 2019: 350 · 2018: 300 · 2017: 275 · 2016: 259 · 2015: 268 · 2014: 245 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 171
FWCI
31.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, breast cancer, distant recurrence, mortality, estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, HER2-negative, prognostic value, natural history (disease), recurrence patterns
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Risk Assessment, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review