The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.
Abstract
To investigate associations among methods for noninvasive measurement of skeletal bone mass, we studied 40 healthy early postmenopausal women and 68 older postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods included single- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine, single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the distal third of the radius, and combined cortical thickness (CCT) of the second metacarpal shaft. Lateral thoracolumbar radiography was performed, and a spinal fracture index was calculated. There was good correlation between QCT and DPA methods in early postmenopausal women and modest correlation in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Correlations between spinal measurements (QCT or DPA) and appendicular cortical measurements (SPA or CCT) were modest in healthy women and poor in osteoporotic women. Measurements resulting from one method are not predictive of those by another method for the individual patient. The strongest correlation with severity of vertebral fracture is provided by QCT; the weakest, by SPA. There was a high correlation between single- and dual-energy QCT results, indicating that errors due to vertebral fat are not substantial in these postmenopausal women. Single-energy QCT may be adequate and perhaps preferable for assessing postmenopausal women. The measurement of spinal trabecular bone density by QCT discriminates between osteoporotic women and younger healthy women with more sensitivity than measurements of spinal integral bone by DPA or of appendicular cortical bone by SPA or CCT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique
Genant, H. K., Wu, C. Y., van Kuijk, C., & Nevitt, M. C. (1993) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 · Cited by 3,691
Self-citationGrampp, S., Genant, H. K., Mathur, A., Lang, P., Jergas, M., Takada, M., Glüer, C.-C., Lu, Y., & Chavez, M. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.5.697 · Cited by 398
Self-citationIncreased Bone Marrow Fat in Anorexia Nervosa
Bredella, M. A., Fazeli, P. K., Miller, K. K., Misra, M., Torriani, M., Thomas, B. J., Ghomi, R. H., Rosen, C. J., & Klibanski, A. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-2532 · Cited by 386
Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65
Steiger, P., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Spencer, N. E., & Genant, H. K. (1992) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650070606 · Cited by 344
Self-citationBiomechanics of Fracture Risk Prediction of the Hip and Spine by Quantitative Computed Tomography
Hayes, W. C., Piazza, S. J., & Zysset, P. K. (1991) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02675-6 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinbold, W. D., Genant, H. K., Reiser, U. J., Harris, S. T., & Ettinger, B.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 469-478
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2110032816
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726129
- The paper
- Reinbold, W. D., Genant, H. K., Reiser, U. J., Harris, S. T., & Ettinger, B. (1986). Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.