Cited by 3,691Bone health and osteoporosis researchSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesScoliosis diagnosis and treatment

Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique

Genant, Harry K., Wu, Chun Y., van Kuijk, Cornelis, Nevitt, Michael C.·1993·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

The assessment of vertebral fracture by conventional radiography has been refined and improved using either semiquantitative or quantitative criteria. The inter- and intraobserver variability was determined for a semiquantitative visual approach that we routinely use in clinical studies for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. In addition, the semiquantitative approach was compared with a quantitative morphometric approach. The incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures were determined in 57 postmenopausal women (age 65-75 years) by three independent observers. The radiographic basis for fracture definitions and the source of interobserver agreement for the semiquantitative technique. We conclude that the semiquantitative approach can be applied reliably in vertebral fracture assessment when performed using well-defined criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genant, H. K., Wu, C. Y., van Kuijk, C., & Nevitt, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco
Corresponding author
Genant, Harry K.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1993-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
1137-1148
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2044178924
Cited by
3,691
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 151 · 2016: 165 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 152
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
vertebral fractures, semi-quantitative analysis, interobserver variability, intraobserver variability, morphometrics, postmenopausal women, osteoporosis, fracture prevalence, fracture incidence
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fractures, Spontaneous, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Radiography, Thoracic Vertebrae, Observer Variation, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Spinal Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review