Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Halving MR imaging time by conjugation: demonstration at 3.5 kG.

Feinberg, D A, Hale, J D, Watts, J C, Kaufman, L, Mark, A·1986·Radiology

Abstract

Conjugation can be used to synthesize half of the data acquired during a conventional two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging procedure, thus reducing imaging time by nearly half. The images acquired by this process have the same object contrast and spatial resolution as conventional images do, but with a 40% reduction in the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). Conjugation can be used to advantage in magnetic resonance imaging units in which S/N levels are higher than needed to permit imaging with a single acquisition of each projection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763926

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Feinberg, D. A., Hale, J. D., Watts, J. C., Kaufman, L., & Mark, A.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1986-11
Volume
161
Issue
2
Pages
527-531
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2007414430
Cited by
259
References
0
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halving MR imaging time by conjugation: demonstration at 3.5 kG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763926
The paper
Feinberg, D. A., Hale, J. D., Watts, J. C., Kaufman, L., & Mark, A. (1986). Halving MR imaging time by conjugation: demonstration at 3.5 kG. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763926

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.