The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis.
Abstract
In a retrospective study of adrenal masses evaluated with computed tomography (CT), lesion x-ray attenuation was compared with size and radiologists' interpretations in discriminating benign lesions from malignant ones. Unenhanced CT attenuation coefficient and size were analyzed electronically in 55 patients with 66 adrenal masses. There were 38 nonhyperfunctioning adenomas in 33 patients and 28 malignant masses in 22 patients. Primary extraadrenal malignancies were present in 45 of the 55 patients. Three blinded readers characterized the adrenal masses using a seven-point scale of certainty. Results were subjected to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The mean CT attenuation coefficient for benign adrenal masses was -2.2 HU +/- 16.0 and was significantly different from the mean for malignant lesions (28.9 HU +/- 10.6). The area under the ROC curve for CT attenuation coefficients (0.91 +/- 0.04) was significantly larger than that for lesion size (0.84 +/- 0.05) or best observer interpretation (0.84 +/- 0.05). A threshold CT attenuation value of 0 HU had a sensitivity-to-specificity ratio of 47%:100% for characterizing benign adrenal masses, whereas a threshold attenuation of 10 HU had a ratio of 79%:96%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update
Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-2639 · Cited by 775
Song, J. H., Chaudhry, F. S., & Mayo-Smith, W. W. (2008) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.07.2799 · Cited by 579
State-of-the-Art Adrenal Imaging
Mayo-Smith, W. W., Boland, G. W., Noto, R. B., & Lee, M. J. (2001) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl21995 · Cited by 359
Self-citationSzolar, D. H., Korobkin, M., Reittner, P., Berghold, A., Bauernhofer, T., Trummer, H., Schoellnast, H., Preidler, K. W., & Samonigg, H. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2342031876 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M. J., Hahn, P. F., Papanicolaou, N., Egglin, T. K., Saini, S., Mueller, P. R., & Simeone, J. F.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 415-418
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2131958213
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014283
- The paper
- Lee, M. J., Hahn, P. F., Papanicolaou, N., Egglin, T. K., Saini, S., Mueller, P. R., & Simeone, J. F. (1991). Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.