The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis.
Abstract
Three-dimensional quantitative computed tomographic (QCT) studies of the lumbar spine were extended with finite element analysis (FEA) to include bone distribution in assessment of vertebral body strength. Fifty-nine FEA models were created from data from 43 patients, 28 with no evidence of osteoporosis and 15 with previous vertebral fractures. Simulated loads were applied to the vertebral models to estimate vertebral strength. Yield strength in the models from patients with osteoporosis was 0.22-1.05 MPa (average, 0.57 MPa +/- 0.26 [mean +/- standard deviation]), compared with 0.80-2.79 MPa (1.46 +/- 0.52, P less than .001) in patients with normal bone. Yield strength of vertebrae in patients with osteoporosis uniformly fell below approximately 1.0 MPa, with minimal overlap between patients with osteoporosis and those with normal bone compared with the overlap in bone mineral content and trabecular mineral density. Reproducibility of the FEA technique was 12.1% in a subgroup of patients with normal bone. A constant relationship between cortical and trabecular contributions was observed in patients with osteoporosis but not in control patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Engelke, K., Adams, J. E., Armbrecht, G., Augat, P., Bogado, C. E., Bouxsein, M. L., Felsenberg, D., Ito, M., Prevrhal, S., Hans, D. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Densitometry · doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 · Cited by 617
Jiang, Y., Zhao, J. J., Mitlak, B. H., Wang, O., Genant, H. K., & Eriksen, E. F. (2003) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1932 · Cited by 616
Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone
Keaveny, T. M., Pinilla, T. P., Crawford, R. P., Kopperdahl, D. L., & Lou, A. (1997) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100150115 · Cited by 377
Glüer, C.-C., Marin, F., Ringe, J. D., Hawkins, F., Möricke, R., Papaioannu, N., Farahmand, P., Minisola, S., Martínez, G., Nolla, J. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1870 · Cited by 171
Christiansen, B. A., Kopperdahl, D. L., Kiel, D. P., Keaveny, T. M., & Bouxsein, M. L. (2011) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.287 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Faulkner, K. G., Cann, C. E., & Hasegawa, B. H.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 669-674
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2027670888
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027972
- The paper
- Faulkner, K. G., Cann, C. E., & Hasegawa, B. H. (1991). Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.