The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based quantitative phase-contrast cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) velocity imaging for prediction of successful shunting in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (mean age, 73 years) with NPH underwent routine MR imaging and CSF velocity MR imaging before ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting. The calculated CSF stroke volume and the aqueductal CSF flow void score were compared with the surgical results. RESULTS: All 12 patients with CSF stroke volumes greater than 42 microL responded favorably to CSF shunting. Of the six patients with stroke volumes of 42 microL or less, three improved with shunting while three did not. The relationship between CSF stroke volume greater than 42 microL and favorable response to VP shunting was statistically significant (P < .05). There was no statistically significant relationship between aqueductal CSF flow void score and responsiveness to shunting. CONCLUSION: CSF velocity MR imaging is useful in the selection of patients with NPH to undergo shunt formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation
Brinker, T., Stopa, E., Morrison, J., & Klinge, P. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-10 · Cited by 819
Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Ringstad, G., Vatnehol, S. A. S., & Eide, P. K. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx191 · Cited by 722
Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Second Edition
MORI, E., ISHIKAWA, M., KATO, T., KAZUI, H., MIYAKE, H., MIYAJIMA, M., NAKAJIMA, M., HASHIMOTO, M., KURIYAMA, N., TOKUDA, T., et al. (2012) · Neurologia medico-chirurgica · doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 · Cited by 666
The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility
Wagshul, M. E., Eide, P. K., & Madsen, J. R. (2011) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-5 · Cited by 473
Marmarou, A., Bergsneider, M., Klinge, P., Relkin, N., & Black, P. M. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168184.01002.60 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, W. G., Scalzo, D., Queralt, J., Nitz, W. N., Atkinson, D. J., & Wong, P.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 523-529
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2023718374
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861
- The paper
- Bradley, W. G., Scalzo, D., Queralt, J., Nitz, W. N., Atkinson, D. J., & Wong, P. (1996). Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
