The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with focal liver lesions underwent T2- and T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fast low-angle shot two-dimensional MR imaging before, during, and after intravenous administration of three different doses of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5, 25, and 50 mumol per kilogram body weight). Gd-DTPA-enhanced imaging (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight) was performed in the same patients within 1 week of Gd-EOB-DTPA imaging. RESULTS: During the perfusion phase (the 3 minutes after injection of contrast material), the dynamic enhancement characteristics seen after injection of 25 and 50 mumol of Gd-EOB-DTPA were similar to those seen with Gd-DTPA. At the lowest dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5 mumol), the dynamic enhancement characteristics were not comparable to those seen with Gd-DTPA. During the hepatobiliary phase (1.5 minutes to 4 hours after injection), Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images yielded a dose-independent, statistically significant improvement in the detection rate of additional metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas compared with unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced images (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging enables improved detection of hepatic lesions over Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging while providing comparable differential diagnostic information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huppertz, A., Balzer, T., Blakeborough, A., Breuer, J., Giovagnoni, A., Heinz-Peer, G., Laniado, M., Manfredi, R. M., Mathieu, D. G., Mueller, D., et al. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2301020269 · Cited by 396
Self-citationGadoxetate acid-enhanced MR imaging for HCC: A review for clinicians
Chanyaputhipong, J., Low, S.-C. A., & Chow, P. K. H. (2011) · International Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4061/2011/489342 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogl, T. J., Kümmel, S., Hammerstingl, R., Schellenbeck, M., Schumacher, G., Balzer, T., Schwarz, W., Müller, P. K., Bechstein, W. O., Mack, M. G., Söllner, O., & Felix, R.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-67
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2023116210
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657946
- The paper
- Vogl, T. J., Kümmel, S., Hammerstingl, R., Schellenbeck, M., Schumacher, G., Balzer, T., Schwarz, W., Müller, P. K., Bechstein, W. O., Mack, M. G., Söllner, O., & Felix, R. (1996). Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.