Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

Vogl, T J, Kümmel, S, Hammerstingl, R, Schellenbeck, M, Schumacher, G, Balzer, T, Schwarz, W, Müller, P K, Bechstein, W O, Mack, M G, Söllner, O, Felix, R·1996·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with focal liver lesions underwent T2- and T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fast low-angle shot two-dimensional MR imaging before, during, and after intravenous administration of three different doses of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5, 25, and 50 mumol per kilogram body weight). Gd-DTPA-enhanced imaging (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight) was performed in the same patients within 1 week of Gd-EOB-DTPA imaging. RESULTS: During the perfusion phase (the 3 minutes after injection of contrast material), the dynamic enhancement characteristics seen after injection of 25 and 50 mumol of Gd-EOB-DTPA were similar to those seen with Gd-DTPA. At the lowest dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5 mumol), the dynamic enhancement characteristics were not comparable to those seen with Gd-DTPA. During the hepatobiliary phase (1.5 minutes to 4 hours after injection), Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images yielded a dose-independent, statistically significant improvement in the detection rate of additional metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas compared with unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced images (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging enables improved detection of hepatic lesions over Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging while providing comparable differential diagnostic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657946

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Vogl, T. J., Kümmel, S., Hammerstingl, R., Schellenbeck, M., Schumacher, G., Balzer, T., Schwarz, W., Müller, P. K., Bechstein, W. O., Mack, M. G., Söllner, O., & Felix, R.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1996-07
Volume
200
Issue
1
Pages
59-67
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2023116210
Cited by
453
References
0
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657946
The paper
Vogl, T. J., Kümmel, S., Hammerstingl, R., Schellenbeck, M., Schumacher, G., Balzer, T., Schwarz, W., Müller, P. K., Bechstein, W. O., Mack, M. G., Söllner, O., & Felix, R. (1996). Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657946

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.