Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Paramagnetic metal scavenging by melanin: MR imaging.

Enochs, W S, Petherick, P, Bogdanova, A, Mohr, U, Weissleder, R·1997·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitate the binding of metals to synthetic melanin in vitro, which is believed to be the reason why melanotic melanomas are hyperintense on T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, and to test whether such binding by natural melanin can be detected in cultured melanoma cells in vivo with MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven synthetic metallomelanins were prepared and their metal contents and relaxivities determined. Melanotic PC1A and amelanotic B16 melanoma cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of iron. MR images of synthetic melanin and cell phantoms were obtained. RESULTS: The iron-binding capacities and relaxivities of the different synthetic metallomelanins varied considerably, which reflects the heterogeneous structure of melanin and the complexity of its binding of metals. Nevertheless, the MR signal intensities of the synthetic melanin and cell phantoms show marked increases that scale, respectively, with increasing iron content and iron concentration in the incubation medium. CONCLUSION: Melanotic melanomas are hyperintense on T1-weighted images because of paramagnetic metal scavenging. This observation has implications for the interpretation of MR images, the improved detection of melanomas, and the development of imaging marker genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240529

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Enochs, W. S., Petherick, P., Bogdanova, A., Mohr, U., & Weissleder, R.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1997-08
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
417-423
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W1969044084
Cited by
290
References
0
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.