Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 763

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Niklason, L T, Christian, B T, Niklason, L E, Kopans, D B, Castleberry, D E, Opsahl-Ong, B H, Landberg, C E, Slanetz, P J, Giardino, A A, Moore, R, Albagli, D, DeJule, M C, Fitzgerald, P F, Fobare, D F, Giambattista, B W, Kwasnick, R F, Liu, J, Lubowski, S J, Possin, G E, Richotte, J F, Wei, C Y, Wirth, R F·1997·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a method of tomosynthesis breast imaging with a full-field digital mammographic system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this tomosynthesis method, low-radiation-dose images were acquired as the x-ray source was moved in an arc above the stationary breast and digital detector. A step-and-expose method of imaging was used. Breast tomosynthesis and conventional images of two imaging phantoms and four mastectomy specimens were obtained. Three experienced readers scored the relative lesion visibility, lesion margin visibility, and confidence in the classification of six lesions. RESULTS: Tomosynthesis image-reconstruction algorithms allow tomographic imaging of the entire breast from a single arc of the x-ray source and at a radiation dose comparable with that in single-view mammography. Except for images of a large mass in a fatty breast, the tomosynthesis images were superior to the conventional images. CONCLUSION: Digital mammographic systems make breast tomosynthesis possible. Tomosynthesis may improve the specificity of mammography with improved lesion margin visibility and may improve early breast cancer detection, especially in women with radiographically dense breasts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 763

Metadata

Authors
Niklason, L. T., Christian, B. T., Niklason, L. E., Kopans, D. B., Castleberry, D. E., Opsahl-Ong, B. H., Landberg, C. E., Slanetz, P. J., Giardino, A. A., Moore, R., Albagli, D., DeJule, M. C., Fitzgerald, P. F., Fobare, D. F., Giambattista, B. W., Kwasnick, R. F., Liu, J., Lubowski, S. J., Possin, G. E., Richotte, J. F., Wei, C. Y., & Wirth, R. F.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1997-11
Volume
205
Issue
2
Pages
399-406
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2007930540
Cited by
763
References
0
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620
The paper
Niklason, L. T., Christian, B. T., Niklason, L. E., Kopans, D. B., Castleberry, D. E., Opsahl-Ong, B. H., Landberg, C. E., Slanetz, P. J., Giardino, A. A., Moore, R., Albagli, D., DeJule, M. C., Fitzgerald, P. F., Fobare, D. F., Giambattista, B. W., Kwasnick, R. F., Liu, J., Lubowski, S. J., Possin, G. E., . . . Wirth, R. F. (1997). Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.