The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Imaged within 6 Hours of Stroke Symptom Onset
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed within 6 hours of the onset of stroke symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the patient records and images from all patients hospitalized in a 10-month period in whom diffusion-weighted imaging was performed within 6 hours of the onset of strokelike symptoms (n = 22). Analyses included comparison of the initial interpretation of the diffusion-weighted images with the final clinical diagnosis; blinded reviews of computed tomographic (CT) scans and conventional and diffusion-weighted images; and determination of lesion contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). RESULTS: Diffusion-weighted images indicated stroke in 14 patients, all of whom had a final diagnosis of acute stroke. Diffusion-weighted images were negative in eight patients, all of whom had a final clinical diagnosis other than stroke (100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, chi 2 = 23.00, P < .0001). Blinded reviews yielded 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity for diffusion-weighted MR imaging (chi 2 = 15.43, P < .0005); 18% sensitivity and 100% specificity for conventional MR imaging (chi 2 = 2.85, P > .2); and 45% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CT (chi 2 = 4.40, P > .10). Lesion percentage CNRs were 77% for diffusion-weighted imaging, 5.5% for CT, 9.8% for T2-weighted MR imaging, and 3.1% for proton-density-weighted MR imaging (P < .002 for diffusion-weighted imaging vs others). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging is highly accurate for diagnosing stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset and is superior to CT and conventional MR imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke
Warach, S., Chien, D., Li, W., Ronthal, M., & Edelman, R. R. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.9.1717 · Cited by 881
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547
Marino, B. S., Lipkin, P. H., Newburger, J. W., Peacock, G., Gerdes, M., Gaynor, J. W., Mussatto, K. A., Uzark, K., Goldberg, C. S., Johnson, W. H., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318265ee8a · Cited by 1,608
Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI.
Le Bihan, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1119 · Cited by 1,571
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain
Schaefer, P. W., Grant, P. E., & Gonzalez, R. G. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationClinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: Past, present, and future
Iima, M., & Le Bihan, D. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150244 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- González, R. G., Schaefer, P. W., Buonanno, F. S., Schwamm, L. H., Budzik, R. F., Rordorf, G., Wang, B., Sorensen, A. G., & Koroshetz, W. J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-162
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2099708759
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Imaged within 6 Hours of Stroke Symptom Onset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja02155
- The paper
- González, R. G., Schaefer, P. W., Buonanno, F. S., Schwamm, L. H., Budzik, R. F., Rordorf, G., Wang, B., Sorensen, A. G., & Koroshetz, W. J. (1999). Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Imaged within 6 Hours of Stroke Symptom Onset. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja02155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.