The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of MR Imaging after the Administration of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with Dual-Phase CT by Using Alternative-Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and dual-phase computed tomography (CT) in the depiction of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one hepatic resection candidates with known colorectal metastases were examined. MR imaging comprised fast spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted imaging, T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) fast low-angle shot imaging before SPIO enhancement, dual-echo SE imaging, T2-weighted fast low-angle shot imaging, and T1-weighted GRE imaging after SPIO enhancement. CT was performed with 8-mm collimation and 1:1 pitch; imaging commenced 20 seconds and 65-70 seconds after injection of 150 mL of contrast medium. All images were reviewed independently by four blinded observers. The alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to analyze the results, which were correlated with findings from surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography, and histopathologic studies in 31 patients and with consensus review together with all other imaging and clinical follow-up in 20 patients. Sensitivities were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity of MR was significantly higher than that of CT (p < .02): 79.8% for MR and 75.3% for CT for all lesions, and 80.6% for MR and 73.5% for CT for malignant lesions. The mean areas under the alternative-free response ROC curves were 0.83 for MR and 0.78 for CT (difference not significant). CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than dual-phase CT in the depiction of colorectal metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of the liver and spleen: review of the first 5 years
Ferrucci, J. T., & Stark, D. D. (1990) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.155.5.2120963 · Cited by 279
Hamm, B., Staks, T., Taupitz, M., Maibauer, R., Speidel, A., Huppertz, A., Frenzel, T., Lawaczeck, R., Wolf, K. J., & Lange, L. (1994) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1880040508 · Cited by 187
Marchal, G., Van Hecke, P., Demaerel, P., Decrop, E., Kennis, C., Baert, A., & van der Schueren, E. (1989) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.152.4.771 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Kinkel, K., Lu, Y., Both, M., Warren, R. S., & Thoeni, R. F. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2243011362 · Cited by 621
Huppertz, A., Balzer, T., Blakeborough, A., Breuer, J., Giovagnoni, A., Heinz-Peer, G., Laniado, M., Manfredi, R. M., Mathieu, D. G., Mueller, D., et al. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2301020269 · Cited by 396
Self-citationTempany, C. M. C., Zou, K. H., Silverman, S. G., Brown, D. L., Kurtz, A. B., & McNeil, B. J. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn25761 · Cited by 381
Contrast Agents for MR Imaging of the Liver
Semelka, R. C., & Helmberger, T. K. G. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja2427 · Cited by 337
Perfusion Imaging of the Liver: Current Challenges and Future Goals
Pandharipande, P. V., Krinsky, G. A., Rusinek, H., & Lee, V. S. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2343031362 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward, J., Naik, K. S., Guthrie, J. A., Wilson, D., & Robinson, P. J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 459-466
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2073207811
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of MR Imaging after the Administration of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with Dual-Phase CT by Using Alternative-Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe05459
- The paper
- Ward, J., Naik, K. S., Guthrie, J. A., Wilson, D., & Robinson, P. J. (1999). Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of MR Imaging after the Administration of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with Dual-Phase CT by Using Alternative-Free Response Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe05459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.