The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glial Neoplasms: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of T2*-weighted echo-planar perfusion imaging by using a first-pass gadopentetate dimeglumine technique to determine the association of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps with histopathologic grading of astrocytomas and to improve the accuracy of targeting of stereotactic biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed in 29 patients by using a first-pass gadopentetate dimeglumine T2*-weighted echo-planar perfusion sequence followed by conventional imaging. The perfusion data were processed to obtain a color map of relative regional CBV. This information formed the basis for targeting the stereotactic biopsy. Relative CBV values were computed with a nondiffusible tracer model. The relative CBV of lesions was expressed as a percentage of the relative CBV of normal white matter. The maximum relative CBV of each lesion was correlated with the histopathologic grading of astrocytomas obtained from samples from stereotactic biopsy or volumetric resection. RESULTS: The maximum relative CBV in high-grade astrocytomas (n = 26) varied from 1.73 to 13.7, with a mean of 5.07 +/- 2.79 (+/- SD), and in the low-grade cohort (n = 3) varied from 0.92 to 2.19, with a mean of 1.44 +/- 0.68. This difference in relative CBV was statistically significant (P < .001; Student t test). CONCLUSION: Echo-planar perfusion imaging is useful in the preoperative assessment of tumor grade and in providing diagnostic information not available with conventional MR imaging. The areas of perfusion abnormality are invaluable in the precise targeting of the stereotactic biopsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging Intratumor Heterogeneity: Role in Therapy Response, Resistance, and Clinical Outcome
O'Connor, J. P. B., Rose, C. J., Waterton, J. C., Carano, R. A. D., Parker, G. J. M., & Jackson, A. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0990 · Cited by 677
Weinstein, J. S., Varallyay, C. G., Dosa, E., Gahramanov, S., Hamilton, B., Rooney, W. D., Muldoon, L. L., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192 · Cited by 500
Jensen, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9827-2 · Cited by 287
Law, M., Saindane, A. M., Ge, Y., Babb, J. S., Johnson, G., Mannon, L. J., Herbert, J., & Grossman, R. I. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030996 · Cited by 242
Self-citationGahramanov, S., Muldoon, L. L., Varallyay, C. G., Li, X., Kraemer, D. F., Fu, R., Hamilton, B. E., Rooney, W. D., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2013) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.12111472 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Knopp, E. A., Cha, S., Johnson, G., Mazumdar, A., Golfinos, J. G., Zagzag, D., Miller, D. C., Kelly, P. J., & Kricheff, I. I.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 791-798
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2026901966
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glial Neoplasms: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn46791
- The paper
- Knopp, E. A., Cha, S., Johnson, G., Mazumdar, A., Golfinos, J. G., Zagzag, D., Miller, D. C., Kelly, P. J., & Kricheff, I. I. (1999). Glial Neoplasms: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn46791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.