The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tumoral Distribution of Long-circulating Dextran-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in a Rodent Model
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the accumulation and cellular uptake of long-circulating dextran-coated iron oxide (LCDIO) particles in malignant neoplasms in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A gliosarcoma rodent model was established to determine the distribution of a model LCDIO preparation in tumors. LCDIO accumulation in tissue sections was evaluated with multichannel fluorescence microscopy with rhodaminated LCDIO, green fluorescent protein as a tumor marker, and Hoechst 33258 dye as an intravital endothelial stain. Uptake into tumor cells was corroborated with results of immunohistochemical and cell culture uptake experiments. The effect of intratumoral LCDIO uptake on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging signal intensity was evaluated with a 1.5-T superconducting magnet. RESULTS: Tumoral accumulation of LCDIO was 0.11% +/- 0.06 of the injected dose per gram of tissue in brain tumors and was sufficient for detection at MR imaging. In tumor sections, LCDIO was preferentially localized in tumor cells (49.0% +/- 4.6) but was also taken up by macrophages in tumors (21.0% +/- 3.1) and by endothelial cells in the areas of active angiogenesis (6.5% +/- 1.4). In cell culture, LCDIO uptake was strongly correlated with growth rate of tumor cell lines. CONCLUSION: Tumoral LCDIO accumulation was not negligible and helped explain MR imaging signal intensity changes observed in clinical trials. Microscopically, LCDIO accumulated predominantly in tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Uptake into tumor cells appeared to be directly proportional to cellular proliferation rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Duan, X., & Li, Y. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201201390 · Cited by 926
Fundamentals and advances in magnetic hyperthermia
Périgo, E. A., Hemery, G., Sandre, O., Ortega, D., Garaio, E., Plazaola, F., & Teran, F. J. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4935688 · Cited by 836
In vivo imaging of siRNA delivery and silencing in tumors
Medarova, Z., Pham, W., Farrar, C., Petkova, V., & Moore, A. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1486 · Cited by 697
Self-citationApplications of nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of cancer
Baetke, S. C., Lammers, T., & Kiessling, F. (2015) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20150207 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, A., Marecos, E., Bogdanov, A., & Weissleder, R.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 568-574
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2106302531
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumoral Distribution of Long-circulating Dextran-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in a Rodent Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe19568
- The paper
- Moore, A., Marecos, E., Bogdanov, A., & Weissleder, R. (2000). Tumoral Distribution of Long-circulating Dextran-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in a Rodent Model. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe19568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.