The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Four Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Image Quality and Volume Coverage Speed
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the imaging performance characteristics of four multidetector-row helical computed tomography (CT) and assess improvement in volume coverage speed over that with single multidetector-row helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The section-sensitivity profile and image noise of a four multidetector-row scanner were measured with phantom scans and compared with predictions from theoretic models. Nominal section thickness ranged from 1.25 to 10.00 mm, beam collimation from 1.25 to 5.00 mm, and table speed from 3.75 to 30.00 mm per rotation. Image artifacts with four and single multidetector-row helical CT were compared in both a phantom study and a subjective rating analysis of clinical images. RESULTS: Compared with single multidetector-row helical CT, the volume coverage speed of four multidetector-row helical CT (range, 3.75-30.00 mm per rotation) is at least twice as fast as that with single multidetector-row helical CT (1.0-10.0 mm per rotation) with fully comparable image quality or, in many cases, three times as fast with diagnostically comparable image quality. CONCLUSION: Compared with single multidetector-row helical CT, four multidetector-row helical CT provides a two- to threefold improvement in volume coverage speed with comparable diagnostic image quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radiation Exposure during Cardiac CT: Effective Doses at Multi–Detector Row CT and Electron-Beam CT
Hunold, P., Vogt, F. M., Schmermund, A., Debatin, J. F., Kerkhoff, G., Budde, T., Erbel, R., Ewen, K., & Barkhausen, J. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2261011365 · Cited by 405
McNulty, N. J., Francis, I. R., Platt, J. F., Cohan, R. H., Korobkin, M., & Gebremariam, A. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl1897 · Cited by 294
Imaging of early pancreatic cancer on multidetector row helical computed tomography
Takeshita, K., Kutomi, K., Haruyama, T., Watanabe, A., Furui, S., Fukushima, J., & Asano, T. (2010) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/80905803 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, H., He, H. D., Foley, W. D., & Fox, S. H.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-62
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1983969827
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Image Quality and Volume Coverage Speed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap3755
- The paper
- Hu, H., He, H. D., Foley, W. D., & Fox, S. H. (2000). Four Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Image Quality and Volume Coverage Speed. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap3755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.