Cited by 32Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsMRI in cancer diagnosis

Imaging of early pancreatic cancer on multidetector row helical computed tomography

Open access
Takeshita, K, Kutomi, K, Haruyama, T, Watanabe, A, Furui, S, Fukushima, J, Asano, T·2010·The British Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Early pancreatic cancer is small and limited to the pancreas. In contrast, small pancreatic cancer may include peripancreatic vasculature or metastasis involvement. This study evaluates images of early pancreatic cancer on multidetector CT (MDCT) using contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging, and post-processed pancreatic duct images. CT findings and pathological features were analysed in eight patients with early pancreatic cancer. Pathological evaluation included location, size and histological grading of the tumour. MDCT evaluation covered the maximum diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), stenosis or obstruction of the MPD, loss of normal lobar texture and associated pancreatitis. Attenuation differences between normal pancreatic parenchyma and the tumour (AD-PT) were also measured. Focal stenosis or obstruction of the MPD with dilatation of the distal MPD was demonstrated in all patients. Associated pancreatitis occurred in six patients with tumours measuring 12 mm or greater. Loss of normal lobar texture was recognised in four cases with the tumour measuring 14 mm or greater. Statistically, low-attenuated lesions and high-attenuated lesions differed with respect to the tumour size (p<0.01), and a positive relationship was demonstrated between the tumour size and AD-PT (r = 0.84). In seven cases, AD-PT is higher during the arterial phase than the pancreatic phase. Early pancreatic cancer appears as low attenuation on early phase, and as high- to iso-attenuation during the pancreatic and delayed phases in respect to the tumour size. Focal stenosis or obstruction of the MPD with dilatation of the distal MPD observed on curved reformation imaging seems important in the diagnosis of early pancreatic cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/bjr/80905803

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Main pancreatic duct dilatation and distal parenchymal atrophy are characteristic findings of early pancreatic cancer.

    “In addition, main pancreatic duct dilatation and distal parenchymal atrophy are characteristic findings of early pancreatic cancer (9-12).”

    From Suspicious findings observed retrospectively on CT imaging performed before the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion identifies main pancreatic duct stenosis or obstruction with distal duct dilatation as important for diagnosing early pancreatic cancer. The Results report pancreatic parenchymal atrophy in only two of eight patients and do not establish that it was distal or a characteristic finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT with pancreatic phase acquisition provides statistically significantly better pancreatic, arterial, and portal venous enhancement than that of hepatic phase imaging, with improved tumor-pancreas contrast. Radiology 1996;199:697–701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takeshita, K., Kutomi, K., Haruyama, T., Watanabe, A., Furui, S., Fukushima, J., & Asano, T.
Affiliations
  • Teikyo University Hospital (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
Venue
The British Journal of Radiology
Published
2010-10
Volume
83
Issue
994
Pages
823-830
ISSN
  • 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-880X
OpenAlex
W2089758774
Cited by
32
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
early-stage pancreatic cancer, multidetector computed tomography, main pancreatic duct stenosis, pancreatic duct obstruction, pancreatic duct dilatation, pancreatitis, tumor size, histological grading
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Ducts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, Spiral Computed, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review