The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peripheral Pulmonary Arteries: How Far in the Lung Does Multi-Detector Row Spiral CT Allow Analysis?
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (CT) on identification of peripheral pulmonary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral pulmonary arteries were analyzed on optimally opacified contrast material-enhanced spiral CT angiograms in 30 patients devoid of pleuroparenchymal disease who underwent scanning with multi-detector row CT (collimation, 4 x 1 mm; pitch, 1.7-2.0; scanning time, 0.5 second). Two series of scans were systematically generated from each data set, 1.25-mm-thick (group 1) and 3-mm-thick (group 2) sections, leading to the analysis of 600 segmental (20 arteries per patient), 1,200 subsegmental (40 arteries per patient), 2,400 fifth-order (80 arteries per patient), and 4,800 sixth-order (160 arteries per patient) pulmonary arteries in each group. RESULTS: Multi-detector row CT with reconstructed scans of 1.25-mm-thick sections (group 1) allowed (a) analysis of a significantly higher percentage of subsegmental arteries (94% in group 1 vs 82% in group 2; P <.001) and (b) a significantly higher percentage of fifth- and sixth-order arteries, respectively, identified in 74% and 35% of cases in group 1 and 47% and 16% in group 2 (P <.001). The causes for inadequate depiction of subsegmental branches in group 1 were partial volume effect (43%), anatomic variants (39%), and cardiac (17%) and respiratory (1%) motion artifacts. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT with reconstructed scans of 1.25-mm-thick sections enables accurate analysis of peripheral pulmonary arteries down to the fifth order on spiral CT angiograms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remy-Jardin, M., Remy, J., Wattinne, L., & Giraud, F. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410342 · Cited by 788
Self-citationPeripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol.
Remy-Jardin, M., Remy, J., Artaud, D., Deschildre, F., & Duhamel, A. (1997) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205239 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Cited by
Konstantinides, S. V., Meyer, G., Becattini, C., Bueno, H., Geersing, G.-J., Harjola, V.-P., Huisman, M. V., Humbert, M., Jennings, C. S., Jiménez, D., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405 · Cited by 4,916
2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism
Authors/Task Force Members, Konstantinides, S. V., Torbicki, A., Agnelli, G., Danchin, N., Fitzmaurice, D., Galiè, N., Gibbs, J. S. R., Huisman, M. V., Humbert, M., et al. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283 · Cited by 3,128
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghaye, B., Szapiro, D., Mastora, I., Delannoy, V., Duhamel, A., Remy, J., & Remy-Jardin, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 629-636
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2065504555
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peripheral Pulmonary Arteries: How Far in the Lung Does Multi-Detector Row Spiral CT Allow Analysis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn32629
- The paper
- Ghaye, B., Szapiro, D., Mastora, I., Delannoy, V., Duhamel, A., Remy, J., & Remy-Jardin, M. (2001). Peripheral Pulmonary Arteries: How Far in the Lung Does Multi-Detector Row Spiral CT Allow Analysis? Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn32629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
