The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Abstract
With the introduction of contrast agents, advances in surface coil technology, and development of new imaging protocols, contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has emerged as a promising modality for detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. The reported sensitivity of MR imaging for the visualization of invasive cancer has approached 100%. There are many examples in the literature of MR imaging--demonstrated mammographically, sonographically, and clinically occult breast cancer. Often, breast cancer detected on MR images has resulted in a change in patient care. Despite these results, there are many unresolved issues, including no defined standard technique for contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging, no standard interpretation criteria for evaluating such studies, no consensus on what constitutes clinically important enhancement, and no clearly defined clinical indications for the use of MR imaging. Furthermore, this technology remains costly, and issues of cost-effectiveness and cost competition from percutaneous biopsy have yet to be fully addressed. These factors along with the lack of commercially available MR imaging--guided localization and biopsy systems have slowed the transfer of this imaging technology from research centers to clinical breast imaging practices. Technical requirements, potential clinical applications, and potential pitfalls and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR imaging as a method to help detect, diagnose, and stage breast cancer will be described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis — Correlation in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Weidner, N., Semple, J. P., Welch, W. R., & Folkman, J. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199101033240101 · Cited by 5,627
What Is the Evidence That Tumors Are Angiogenesis Dependent?
Folkman, J. (1990) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/82.1.4 · Cited by 4,531
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Woods, J. E., Crotty, T. P., Myers, J. L., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Sellers, T. A., Johnson, J. L., McDonnell, S. K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400201 · Cited by 1,423
Kuhl, C. K., Mielcareck, P., Klaschik, S., Leutner, C., Wardelmann, E., Gieseke, J., & Schild, H. H. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101 · Cited by 1,277
Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction
Claus, E. B., Risch, N., & Thompson, W. D. (1994) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::aid-cncr2820730323>3.0.co;2-5 · Cited by 942
Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach
Fischer, U., Kopka, L., & Grabbe, E. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc01881 · Cited by 664
Harms, S. E., Flamig, D. P., Hesley, K. L., Meiches, M. D., Jensen, R. A., Evans, W. P., Savino, D. A., & Wells, R. V. (1993) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475297 · Cited by 634
Kuhl, C. K., Schmutzler, R. K., Leutner, C. C., Kempe, A., Wardelmann, E., Hocke, A., Maringa, M., Pfeifer, U., Krebs, D., & Schild, H. H. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267 · Cited by 538
Boetes, C., Mus, R. D., Holland, R., Barentsz, J. O., Strijk, S. P., Wobbes, T., Hendriks, J. H., & Ruys, S. H. (1995) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480749 · Cited by 519
Cited by
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
Bluemke, D. A. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.22.2735 · Cited by 513
Solin, L. J., Orel, S. G., Hwang, W.-T., Harris, E. E., & Schnall, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.5448 · Cited by 346
Self-citationArriagada, R., Lê, M. G., Guinebretière, J.-M., Dunant, A., Rochard, F., & Tursz, T. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg452 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Orel, S. G., & Schnall, M. D.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-30
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2112450318
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 22.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113
- The paper
- Orel, S. G., & Schnall, M. D. (2001). MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
