The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists
Abstract
Artifacts caused by metallic implants appear as dark and bright streaks at computed tomography (CT), which severely degrade the image quality and decrease the diagnostic value of the examination. When x-rays pass through a metal object, depending on its size and composition, different physical effects negatively affect the measurements in the detector, most notably the effects of photon starvation and beam hardening. To improve image quality and recover information about underlying structures, several artifact reduction methods have been introduced in modern CT systems. Projection-based metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms act in projection space and replace corrupted projections caused by metal with interpolation from neighboring uncorrupted projections. MAR algorithms primarily suppress artifacts that are due to photon starvation. The dual-energy CT technique is characterized by data acquisition at two different energy spectra. Dual-energy CT provides synthesized virtual monochromatic images at different photon energy (kiloelectron volt) levels, and virtual monochromatic images obtained at high kiloelectron volt levels are known to reduce the effects of beam hardening. In clinical practice, although MAR algorithms can be applied after image acquisition, the decision whether to apply dual-energy CT for the patient usually needs to be made before image acquisition. Radiologists should be more familiar with the clinical and technical features of each method and should be able to choose the optimal method according to the clinical situation. ©RSNA, 2018
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fully implantable and bioresorbable cardiac pacemakers without leads or batteries
Choi, Y. S., Yin, R. T., Pfenniger, A., Koo, J., Avila, R., Benjamin Lee, K., Chen, S. W., Lee, G., Li, G., Qiao, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00948-x · Cited by 361
Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia
Obmann, M. M., Punjabi, G., Obmann, V. C., Boll, D. T., Heye, T., Benz, M. R., & Yeh, B. M. (2022) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-021-03188-4 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Katsura, M., Sato, J., Akahane, M., Kunimatsu, A., & Abe, O.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 450-461
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2791928117
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/rg.2018170102
- The paper
- Katsura, M., Sato, J., Akahane, M., Kunimatsu, A., & Abe, O. (2018). Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists. RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.