Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance
Abstract
Artifacts can seriously degrade the quality of computed tomographic (CT) images, sometimes to the point of making them diagnostically unusable. To optimize image quality, it is necessary to understand why artifacts occur and how they can be prevented or suppressed. CT artifacts originate from a range of sources. Physics-based artifacts result from the physical processes involved in the acquisition of CT data. Patient-based artifacts are caused by such factors as patient movement or the presence of metallic materials in or on the patient. Scanner-based artifacts result from imperfections in scanner function. Helical and multisection technique artifacts are produced by the image reconstruction process. Design features incorporated into modern CT scanners minimize some types of artifacts, and some can be partially corrected by the scanner software. However, in many instances, careful patient positioning and optimum selection of scanning parameters are the most important factors in avoiding CT artifacts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The large extracranial metal components and dental cement of the implant can cause beam hardening that can appear as cupping, streaks, dark bands or flare in the μCT.
“the large extracranial metal components and dental cement of the implant can cause beam hardening that can appear as cupping, streaks, dark bands or flare in the µCT38–40.”
From Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances
Hsieh, J. (2015) · doi:10.1117/3.2197756 · Cited by 1,412 · see citing works
Kachelrieß, M., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A. (2001) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1358303 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT
Taguchi, K., & Aradate, H. (1998) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598230 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control
Seeram, E. (2015) · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Artefacts in spiral-CT images and their relation to pitch and subject morphology
Wilting, J. E., & Timmer, J. (1999) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300050673 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour
Carcea, I., Caraballo, N. L., Marlin, B. J., Ooyama, R., Riceberg, J. S., Mendoza Navarro, J. M., Opendak, M., Diaz, V. E., Schuster, L., Alvarado Torres, M. I., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03814-7 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barrett, J. F., & Keat, N.
- Affiliations
- St George's Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Keat, Nicholas
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1679-1691
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2130005339
- Cited by
- 1,688
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiographics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Keywords
- CT artifacts, artifact detection, artifact avoidance, image quality, metallic artifacts, image reconstruction artifacts, patient positioning, scanning parameters, scanner design
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review