The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of Contrast Enhancement in the Brain and Meninges
Abstract
Contrast material enhancement for cross-sectional imaging has been used since the mid 1970s for computed tomography and the mid 1980s for magnetic resonance imaging. Knowledge of the patterns and mechanisms of contrast enhancement facilitate radiologic differential diagnosis. Brain and spinal cord enhancement is related to both intravascular and extravascular contrast material. Extraaxial enhancing lesions include primary neoplasms (meningioma), granulomatous disease (sarcoid), and metastases (which often manifest as mass lesions). Linear pachymeningeal (dura-arachnoid) enhancement occurs after surgery and with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Leptomeningeal (pia-arachnoid) enhancement is present in meningitis and meningoencephalitis. Superficial gyral enhancement is seen after reperfusion in cerebral ischemia, during the healing phase of cerebral infarction, and with encephalitis. Nodular subcortical lesions are typical for hematogenous dissemination and may be neoplastic (metastases) or infectious (septic emboli). Deeper lesions may form rings or affect the ventricular margins. Ring enhancement that is smooth and thin is typical of an organizing abscess, whereas thick irregular rings suggest a necrotic neoplasm. Some low-grade neoplasms are "fluid-secreting," and they may form heterogeneously enhancing lesions with an incomplete ring sign as well as the classic "cyst-with-nodule" morphology. Demyelinating lesions, including both classic multiple sclerosis and tumefactive demyelination, may also create an open ring or incomplete ring sign. Thick and irregular periventricular enhancement is typical for primary central nervous system lymphoma. Thin enhancement of the ventricular margin occurs with infectious ependymitis. Understanding the classic patterns of lesion enhancement--and the radiologic-pathologic mechanisms that produce them--can improve image assessment and differential diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bot, J. C. J., Barkhof, F., à Nijeholt, G. L., van Schaardenburg, D., Voskuyl, A. E., Ader, H. J., Pijnenburg, J. A. L., Polman, C. H., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Vermeulen, E. G. J., et al. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2231010707 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Absinta, M., Ha, S.-K., Nair, G., Sati, P., Luciano, N. J., Palisoc, M., Louveau, A., Zaghloul, K. A., Pittaluga, S., Kipnis, J., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.29738 · Cited by 643
Fukuoka, H., Hirai, T., Okuda, T., Shigematsu, Y., Sasao, A., Kimura, E., Hirano, T., Yano, S., Murakami, R., & Yamashita, Y. (2010) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1937 · Cited by 152
Bench-to-bedside imaging in brain metastases: a road to precision oncology
Shukla, S., Karbhari, A., Rastogi, S., Agarwal, U., Rai, P., & Mahajan, A. (2024) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.015 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Smirniotopoulos, J. G., Murphy, F. M., Rushing, E. J., Rees, J. H., & Schroeder, J. W.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 525-551
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2172248094
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Contrast Enhancement in the Brain and Meninges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/rg.272065155
- The paper
- Smirniotopoulos, J. G., Murphy, F. M., Rushing, E. J., Rees, J. H., & Schroeder, J. W. (2007). Patterns of Contrast Enhancement in the Brain and Meninges. RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.272065155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.