Cited by 168Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Differentiation of Multiple Sclerosis from Other Inflammatory Disorders and Cerebrovascular Disease: Value of Spinal MR Imaging

Bot, Joost C. J., Barkhof, Frederik, à Nijeholt, Geert Lycklama, van Schaardenburg, Dirkjan, Voskuyl, Alexandre E., Ader, Herman J., Pijnenburg, Jolanda A. L., Polman, Chris H. +3 more·2002·Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To determine the value of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the spinal cord to differentiate multiple sclerosis (MS) from other inflammatory disorders and cerebrovascular diseases (together, other neurologic disease [OND]). Materials and methods The study population included 66 patients with OND and 25 patients with MS, who were matched for age, sex, and symptom duration or severity. Brain MR imaging included gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted and dual-echo T2-weighted spin-echo sequences to assess the number, size, and appearance of lesions, contrast enhancement, and compatibility with diagnostic criteria for MS. Spinal cord MR imaging included cardiac-triggered gadolinium-enhanced sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo and dual-echo T2-weighted sequences to assess the general appearance (normal, focal lesion, diffuse abnormality) and number or size of focal lesions. Images obtained in MS and OND patients were compared. Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values with MR images were calculated. Results Brain images were abnormal in all MS patients and in 65% of OND patients. Abnormal cord images were found in 92% of MS and 6% of OND patients. The combination of brain and spinal cord images increased accuracy of diagnosis compared with use of brain images alone. Conclusion In contrast to MS, cord lesions are very uncommon in OND. This finding can help differentiate these disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2231010707

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spinal cord lesions occur in 80-90% of patients with established MS and up to half of patients with CIS, most often in the cervical cord.

    “Spinal cord lesions occur in 80-90% of patients with established MS and up to half of patients with CIS, most often in the cervical cord.10,11”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

  • In older adults, a stringent interpretation of brain MRI criteria for MS is mandatory and spinal cord MRI is helpful since spinal cord lesions do not occur with healthy aging.

    “In this situation a stringent interpretation of brain MRI criteria for MS is mandatory and spinal cord MRI is helpful since spinal cord lesions do not occur with healthy aging.11”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Spinal cord lesions can be very helpful in making a diagnosis of MS (cord lesions do not occur with healthy aging or cerebrovascular disease and provide additional evidence of dissemination in space) and may provide important prognostic information.

    “However, spinal cord lesions can be very helpful in making a diagnosis of MS (cord lesions do not occur with healthy aging or cerebrovascular disease 11 and provide additional evidence of dissemination in space 10 ) and may provide important prognostic information.67”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bot, J. C. J., Barkhof, F., à Nijeholt, G. L., van Schaardenburg, D., Voskuyl, A. E., Ader, H. J., Pijnenburg, J. A. L., Polman, C. H., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Vermeulen, E. G. J., & Castelijns, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Neurology, Inc (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2002-04
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
46-56
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2092959805
Cited by
168
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, spinal cord lesions, differential diagnosis, cerebrovascular disease, gadolinium-enhanced MRI, brain MRI, diagnostic accuracy, spinal cord MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelitis, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review