Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Operation on Reformate Feed: Effects of CO, H[sub 2] Dilution, and High Fuel Utilization

Open access
Springer, T. E., Rockward, T., Zawodzinski, T. A., Gottesfeld, S.·2001·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

We describe a polymer electrolyte fuel cell model emphasizing operation on hydrocarbon reformate, i.e. , the anode feed stream consists of dry concentrations as low as 40%, inlet CO levels of 10-100 ppm, and hydrogen fuel utilization as high as 90%. Refinements of interfacial kinetics equations used in our previous work on CO effects in anodes have yielded a better quantitative fit to the measured dependence of voltage loss on inlet CO level [in Electrode Materials and Processes for Energy Conversion and Storage , J. McBreen, S. Mukerjee, and S. Srinivasan, Editors, PV 97-13, pp. 15-24, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ (1997)]. We calculate anode potential losses by coupling such interfacial kinetic processes to reactant diffusion limitations and ionic resistance in the catalyst layer, and by accounting for the drop in local hydrogen concentration along the flow channel due to significant fuel utilization. As a result of internal readjustment of cell overpotentials when hydrogen concentration drops along the flow channel, we show that loss of current, or power, under the realistic condition of constant cell voltage is smaller than loss of current at constant anode potential. We show that voltage losses associated with CO poisoning are significantly amplified with diluted hydrogen feed streams and particularly so under high fuel utilization. We make projections on improvements required, qualitative and quantitative, in the physical parameters of the anode catalyst surface chemistry to significantly improve "CO tolerance." © 2000 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1344516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Springer, T. E., Rockward, T., Zawodzinski, T. A., & Gottesfeld, S.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2001
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
A11
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015876383
Cited by
283
References
1
FWCI
23.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Operation on Reformate Feed: Effects of CO, H[sub 2] Dilution, and High Fuel Utilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1344516
The paper
Springer, T. E., Rockward, T., Zawodzinski, T. A., & Gottesfeld, S. (2001). Model for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Operation on Reformate Feed: Effects of CO, H[sub 2] Dilution, and High Fuel Utilization. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1344516

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.