Cited by 693Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesCopper-based nanomaterials and applications

Particle Size Effects on the Electrochemical Performance of Copper Oxides toward Lithium

Open access
Grugeon, S., Laruelle, S., Herrera-Urbina, R., Dupont, L., Poizot, P., Tarascon, J-M.·2001·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

The electrochemical reactivity of tailor-made or CuO powders prepared according to the polyol process was tested in rechargeable Li cells. To our surprise, we demonstrated that CuO, a material well known for primary Li cells, and could reversibly react with 1.1 Li and 2 Li ions per formula unit, respectively, leading to reversible capacities as high as 400 mAh/g in the 3-0.02 V range. The ability of copper oxide-based Li cells to retain their capacity upon numerous cycles was found to be strongly dependent on the particle size, and the best results (100% of the total capacity up to 70 cycles) were obtained with 1 μm and CuO particles. Ex situ transmission electron microscopy data and in situ X-ray experiments show that the reduction mechanism of by Li first involved the formation of Cu nanograins dispersed into a lithia matrix, followed by the growth of an organic coating that partially dissolved upon the subsequent charge while Cu converted back to nanograins. We believe that the key to the reversible reactivity mechanism of copper oxides or other transition metal oxides toward Li is the electrochemically driven formation of highly reactive metallic nanograins during the first discharge, which enables the formation-decomposition of upon subsequent cycles. © 2001 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1353566

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The change in interfacial properties underpins degradation for these batteries.

    “suggesting that it is the change in the interfacial properties that underpins degradation for these batteries; this is consistent with the results obtained in previous works35”

    From Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that an organic coating at the electrode surface can, depending on precursor size, negatively affect capacity retention during cycling. This supports a possible link between interfacial changes and degradation in the copper-oxide cells studied, but not the unqualified claim that such changes underpin degradation for these batteries generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, and J. -M. Tarascon, Paper presented at IMLB-10 Conference on Li batteries, Como, Italy, May 28-June 2, 2000.
  2. R. Bates and Y. Jumel, Lithium Batteries, p. 89, Academic Press, New York ͑1983͒.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grugeon, S., Laruelle, S., Herrera-Urbina, R., Dupont, L., Poizot, P., & Tarascon, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Universidad de Sonora (MX)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2001
Volume
148
Issue
4
Pages
A285
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979325119
Cited by
693
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 50
FWCI
24.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
Keywords
copper oxide, lithium-ion batteries, particle size effects, polyol synthesis, reversible capacity, cycling stability, transition metal oxides, lithiation and delithiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review