CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 586Battery Modeling and ManagementAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mathematical Modeling of the Lithium Deposition Overcharge Reaction in Lithium‐Ion Batteries Using Carbon‐Based Negative Electrodes

Open access
Arora, Pankaj, Doyle, Marc, White, Ralph E.·1999·Journal of The Electrochemical Society
DOI 10.1149/1.1392512
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The processes that lead to capacity fading affect severely the cycle life and rate behavior of lithium‐ion cells. One such process is the overcharge of the negative electrode causing lithium deposition, which can lead to capacity losses including a loss of active lithium and electrolyte and represents a potential safety hazard. A mathematical model is presented to predict lithium deposition on the negative electrode under a variety of operating conditions. The , 2:1 ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate, poly(vinylidene fluoride‐hexalfuoropropylene)| cell is simulated to investigate the influence of lithium deposition on the charging behavior of intercalation electrodes. The model is used to study the effect of key design parameters (particle size, electrode thickness, and mass ratio) on the lithium deposition overcharge reaction. The model predictions are compared for coke and graphite‐based negative electrodes. The cycling behavior of these cells is simulated before and after overcharge to understand the effect of overcharge on extended cycling. These results can be used to establish operational and design limits within which safety hazards and capacity fade problems, inherent in these cells, can be minimized. © 1999 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1392512

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. P. Arora, R. E. White, and M. Doyle, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 3647 (1998).
  2. M. Doyle, T. F. Fuller, and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1527 (1993).
  3. T. F. Fuller, M. Doyle, and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 141, 1 (1994).
  4. M. Doyle, J. Newman, A. S. Gozdz, C. N. Schmutz, and J. M. Tarascon, J. Elec- trochem. Soc., 143, 1890 (1996).
  5. P. Arora, M. Doyle, A. S. Gozdz, R. E. White, and J. Newman, Advances in Math- ematical Modeling and Simulation of Electrochemical Processes and Oxygen Depolarized Cathodes for Chlor-Alkali and Chlorate Processes, J. W. Van Zee, T. F. Fuller, P. C. Foller, and F. Hine, Editors, PV 98-10, p. 29, The Electrochemi- cal Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ (1998).
  6. R. Darling and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 990 (1998).
  7. A. N. Dey and B. P. Sullivan, J. Electrochem. Soc., 117, 222 (1970).
  8. R. Fong, U. Von Sacken, and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 2009 (1990).
  9. J. S. Newman, Electrochemical Systems, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991).
  10. R. Jasinski, Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, Vol. 8, P. Delahay and C. W. Tobias, Editors, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1971).
  11. M. W. Verbrugge and B. J. Koch, J. Electroanal. Chem., 367, 123 (1994).
  12. M. W. Verbrugge, AIChE J., 41, 1550 (1995).
  13. E. Peled, D. Golodnitsky, C. Menachem, and D. Bar-Tow, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 3482 (1998).
  14. Y. Geronov, F. Schwager, and R. H. Muller, in Lithium Nonaqueous Battery Elec- trochemistry, E. G. Yeager, B. Schumm, G. Blomgren, D. R. Blankenship, V. Leger, and J. Akridge, Editors, PV 80-7, p. 115, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Princeton, NJ (1980).
  15. E. Peled, Ambient Temperature Lithium Batteries, J. P. Gabano, Editor, Academic Press, New York (1983).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 582

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Arora, P., Doyle, M., & White, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
ORCID
White, Ralph E.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Publisher
The Electrochemical Society
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
146
Issue
10
Pages
3543-3553
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
DOI
10.1149/1.1392512
OpenAlex
W2059262407
Cited by
586
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Research and Development
  • University of South Carolina
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
lithium plating, overcharging, lithium-ion batteries, carbon negative electrode, capacity fade, mathematical modeling, coke, graphite, intercalation electrodes, particle size, electrode thickness, mass ratio, cycling behavior, safety hazards, PVDF-HFP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review