The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Performance of a New Mesoporous Carbon
Open accessAbstract
A new mesoporous carbon (NMC) was prepared, and its performance in an electric double‐layer capacitor (EDLC) was compared to that of a conventional carbon (a molecular‐sieving carbon, MSC25). The effect of pore size and pore connection pattern on EDLC performance was demonstrated. To prepare NMC, phenol resin was synthesized inside the pores of an inorganic template, Mobile Composite Material 48 (MCM48), and the resulting resin‐template composite was carbonized at 700°C under Ar atmosphere. A coke‐like carbonaceous material was obtained after removing the inorganic template by HF treatment. The surface area of NMC was which is smaller than that of MSC25 . NMC had three‐dimensionally interconnected mesopores (2.3 nm average diam), but randomly connected cage‐like micropores (<2,0 nm) were dominant in MSC25. The difference in the pore size and pore connection pattern between the two carbons gave rise to a remarkable difference in their EDLC performances. NMC exhibited a smaller specific capacitance than MSC25 as a result of its smaller surface area, but it showed a higher critical scan rate than the MSC25 electrode due to a smaller resistance-capacitance (RC) time constant. The specific charging capacity of the NMC electrode was about and was largely invariant vs . the charge‐discharge rate. This was contrasted by MSC25 which showed a steadily decreasing capacity with an increase in rate. As a result, the NMC electrode outperformed the MSC25 based on rate capability. The smaller RC time constant and better rate capability of the NMC electrode apparently arises from the lower electrolyte resistance in pores, which in turn stems from the faster ionic motion in larger pores. © 2000 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon materials for chemical capacitive energy storage
Zhai, Y., Dou, Y., Zhao, D., Fulvio, P. F., Mayes, R. T., & Dai, S. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201100984 · Cited by 2,964
Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis
Taguchi, A., & Schüth, F. (2005) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.06.030 · Cited by 2,119
Battery‐Supercapacitor Hybrid Devices: Recent Progress and Future Prospects
Zuo, W., Li, R., Zhou, C., Li, Y., Xia, J., & Liu, J. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600539 · Cited by 1,637
Templated nanocarbons for energy storage
Nishihara, H., & Kyotani, T. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201715 · Cited by 745
Lim, E., Jo, C., Kim, H., Kim, M.-H., Mun, Y., Chun, J., Ye, Y., Hwang, J., Ha, K.-S., Roh, K. C., et al. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b02601 · Cited by 459
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoon, S., Lee, J., Hyeon, T., & Oh, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2507
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047055393
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Performance of a New Mesoporous Carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1393561
- The paper
- Yoon, S., Lee, J., Hyeon, T., & Oh, S. M. (2000). Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Performance of a New Mesoporous Carbon. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.