The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Nanostructured Silicon
Open accessAbstract
Anode materials of nanostructured silicon have been prepared by physical vapor deposition and characterized using electrochemical methods. The electrodes were prepared in thin-film form as nanocrystalline particles (12 nm mean diameter) and as continuous amorphous thin films (100 nm thick). The nanocrystalline silicon exhibited specific capacities of around 1100 mAh/g with a 50% capacity retention after 50 cycles. The amorphous thin-film electrodes exhibited initial capacities of 3500 mAh/g with a stable capacity of 2000 mAh/g over 50 cycles. We suggest that the nanoscale dimensions of the silicon circumvents conventional mechanisms of mechanical deterioration, permitting good cycle life. © 2003 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pinson, M. B., & Bazant, M. Z. (2013) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.044302jes · Cited by 946
Metadata
- Authors
- Graetz, J., Ahn, C. C., Yazami, R., & Fultz, B.
- Venue
- Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- A194
- ISSN
- 1099-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090810785
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Nanostructured Silicon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1596917
- The paper
- Graetz, J., Ahn, C. C., Yazami, R., & Fultz, B. (2003). Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Nanostructured Silicon. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1596917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.