The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrochemical‐Calorimetric Studies of Lithium‐Ion Cells
Abstract
An accelerated rate calorimeter in combination with a battery cycler and a precision multimeter was used to measure the heat dissipation from, and heat accumulated in, commercially available lithium‐ion cells during cycling over a range of operating parameters within the limits recommended by the manufacturer. An integral energy balance was used to determine the total heat generated in the test cell during cycling. From the measurements during temperature transients, the heat capacity of the test cell was found to be relatively independent of temperature, ranging from 0.82 to 1.07 J g −1 K −1 . This value agrees relatively well with separate measurements using an adiabatic calorimeter which yield slightly higher values. DC current interruption technique was used to determine the time‐dependent area‐specific impedance, 〈 ASI t 〉, of the cell which was well correlated with steeply increased heat dissipation rate at the end of discharge. The reversible (entropic) heat effect derived from an energy balance was found to be exothermic during discharge and endothermic during charge. Using two different methods, values were obtained for the entropy of reaction (Δ S ) during discharge of the cell. The resulting values obtained with method II, depending on the discharge rate, varied from −41.19 to −80.98 J K −1 per g mole of Li and showed a weak dependence on temperature, in the 35 to 55°C range. The rate dependence of the Δ S values needs further examination in a future study. By extrapolating to zero rate, the reversible entropy of the faradaic reaction for this cell was found to be − 37 ± 3 J K − 1 per g mole of Li within the temperature range. The entropic heat effect and the heat effect associated with nonfaradaic reactions are appreciable and should be included in thermal modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries
Bandhauer, T. M., Garimella, S., & Fuller, T. F. (2011) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3515880 · Cited by 2,192
Wang, Q., Jiang, B., Li, B., & Yan, Y. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.033 · Cited by 1,083
Safety focused modeling of lithium-ion batteries: A review
Abada, S., Marlair, G., Lecocq, A., Petit, M., Sauvant-Moynot, V., & Huet, F. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.100 · Cited by 819
Thermal modeling and design considerations of lithium-ion batteries
Al Hallaj, S., Maleki, H., Hong, J. S., & Selman, J. R. (1999) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(99)00178-0 · Cited by 454
Self-citationAnalysis of Electrochemical and Thermal Behavior of Li-Ion Cells
Srinivasan, V., & Wang, C. Y. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1526512 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Maleki, H., Al Hallaj, S., Redey, L., & Selman, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1489-1501
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2004960594
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical‐Calorimetric Studies of Lithium‐Ion Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1838509
- The paper
- Hong, J., Maleki, H., Al Hallaj, S., Redey, L., & Selman, J. R. (1998). Electrochemical‐Calorimetric Studies of Lithium‐Ion Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.