The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Advanced Tool for the Selection of Electrolyte Components for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Abstract
The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) plays a key role in lithium‐metal, lithium‐alloy, and lithium‐ion batteries. The SEI on both lithium and carbonaceous electrodes consists of many different materials including LiF, Li 2 CO 3 , LiCO 2 ‐ R , Li 2 O , lithium alkoxides, nonconductive polymers, and more. Close to the lithium or Li x C 6 the SEI consists of the thermodynamically stable anions, such as O 2 − , S 2 − , and halides. Close to the solution the SEI also contains partially reduced materials such as polyolefins, semicarbonates, etc. These materials form simultaneously and precipitate on the electrode as a mosaic of microphases. These phases may, under certain conditions, form separate layers, but in general it is more appropriate to treat them as heteropolymicrophases. The SEI composition and properties depend strongly on electrolyte composition and on other factors. Rapid formation of the SEI is important in all lithium batteries, especially in the case of lithium‐ion cells with graphite anodes. Hence SEI precursors must be selected from a group of materials that have high exchange current density ( i 0 ) for reduction. As it is difficult to measure i 0 on solid electrodes and only limited data, if any, are available, it is suggested to use the data bank for the rate constant for the reduction of electrolyte components by hydrated electrons ( e aq − ) . We have demonstrated that the rate constants of the reactions of solvated electrons and electrolyte components and impurities correlate well with the formation voltage of SEI and with SEI composition. Thus, the rate constants ( k e ) for these reactions are proposed as a tool for the first screening of electrolyte components when a new electrolyte is designed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review—SEI: Past, Present and Future
Peled, E., & Menkin, S. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.1441707jes · Cited by 2,182
Self-citationAn, S. J., Li, J., Daniel, C., Mohanty, D., Nagpure, S., & Wood, D. L. (2016) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 · Cited by 2,121
Wang, Y., Nakamura, S., Ue, M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2001) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0164529 · Cited by 494
LiBOB: Is it an alternative salt for lithium ion chemistry?
Xu, K., Zhang, S. S., Lee, U., Allen, J. L., & Jow, T. R. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.153 · Cited by 203
Lu, W., Xiong, S., Xie, K., Pan, Y., & Zheng, C. (2016) · Ionics · doi:10.1007/s11581-016-1743-9 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., Menachem, C., & Bar‐Tow, D.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3482-3486
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W1986787916
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Advanced Tool for the Selection of Electrolyte Components for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1838831
- The paper
- Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., Menachem, C., & Bar‐Tow, D. (1998). An Advanced Tool for the Selection of Electrolyte Components for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.