Cited by 118Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

A Methanol Impermeable Proton Conducting Composite Electrolyte System

Open access
Pu, Cong, Huang, Wenhua, Ley, Kevin L., Smotkin, Eugene S.·1995·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

The concept of a proton conducting, methanol impermeable composite electrolyte system is demonstrated. A three‐layered laminar electrolyte consisting of a dense, methanol impermeable protonic conductor sandwiched between proton permeable electronically insulating layers permits the selective transport of protons while eliminating methanol crossover to the cathode. We demonstrate the selectivity of the composite electrolyte using palladium foil sandwiched between two Nafion™ polymer membranes. The open‐circuit voltage for an fuel cell utilizing this composite electrolyte is unaffected by introduction of methanol to the fuel stream, whereas conventional polymer electrolyte cells suffer severe degradation of performance due to methanol crossover.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.2044333

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In modified Nafion membranes, there was always a significant loss in proton conductivity when methanol permeability was reduced.

    “Unfortunately, there was always a significant loss in proton conductivity when the methanol permeability was reduced.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. R. Savinell, E. Yeager, D. Tryk, U. Landau, J. Wainright, D. Weng, K. Lux, M. Litt, and C. Rogers, This Journal, 141, L46 (1994).
  2. M. Amano, M Komaki, and C. Nishimura, J. Less Common Metals, 172, 727 (1991).
  3. M. S. Wilson and S. Gottesfeld, J. AppL Electrochem., 22, 1 (1992).
  4. H. Tobias, M. T. Paffett, P. A. Pappin, J. Valerio, and S. Gottes- feld, in Direct Methanol-Air Fuel Cells, A. R. Landgrebe, R. K. Sen, and D. J. Wheeler, Editors, PV 92-14, p. 37, The Electro- chemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ (1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pu, C., Huang, W., Ley, K. L., & Smotkin, E. S.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
142
Issue
7
Pages
L119-L120
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2127259657
Cited by
118
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
composite electrolytes, proton-conducting membranes, methanol crossover, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Nafion, palladium foil, open-circuit voltage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review