Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Open access
Yoshida, Toshihiro, Takahashi, Michio, Morikawa, Satoshi, Ihara, Chikashi, Katsukawa, Hiroyuki, Shiratsuchi, Tomoyuki, Yamaki, Jun-ichi·2006·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

Lithium-ion cells with 5-Ah capacity were fabricated using a spinel as a cathode active material, graphitized carbon as an anode active material, and 1 M as an electrolyte. In order to improve the calendar life of the cell, we investigated the degradation mechanism by measuring the thickness of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on anode active material. The SEI thickness was measured by focused ion beam, scanning electron microscope, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The thickness of the SEI was initially , and after storage for 392 days at 25 and 40°C, the thickness was 0.15 and , respectively. The capacity decreased with increase in the thickness of SEI, because Li in the cell is consumed by forming SEI. The amount of Li consumption was estimated theoretically assuming that SEI is formed by a reaction between intercalated Li and the electrolyte in SEI on the negative carbon surface, and a diffusion of the electrolyte in the SEI is the rate-determining step of the reaction. The theoretical equation showed a good agreement with experimental capacity fade at 25, 40, and 60°C for the storing days up to 380 days. A voltage decrease of the cell after 1-s at 20 A of discharge current was measured to estimate roughly the increase of the cell internal resistance during storage. The increase of SEI resistance was estimated by the theoretical equation and compared with the experimental voltage drop data after 1-s discharge. However, the theoretical data was not in a good agreement with the experimental data. The reason is that the charge-transfer resistance on the anode also increases during storage. Another reason is the resistance change of the cathode during the storage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.2162467

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Yoshida, T., Takahashi, M., Morikawa, S., Ihara, C., Katsukawa, H., Shiratsuchi, T., & Yamaki, J.-I.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2006
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
A576
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019525562
Cited by
182
References
2
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.2162467
The paper
Yoshida, T., Takahashi, M., Morikawa, S., Ihara, C., Katsukawa, H., Shiratsuchi, T., & Yamaki, J.-I. (2006). Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2162467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.