The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Lithium-ion cells with 5-Ah capacity were fabricated using a spinel as a cathode active material, graphitized carbon as an anode active material, and 1 M as an electrolyte. In order to improve the calendar life of the cell, we investigated the degradation mechanism by measuring the thickness of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on anode active material. The SEI thickness was measured by focused ion beam, scanning electron microscope, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The thickness of the SEI was initially , and after storage for 392 days at 25 and 40°C, the thickness was 0.15 and , respectively. The capacity decreased with increase in the thickness of SEI, because Li in the cell is consumed by forming SEI. The amount of Li consumption was estimated theoretically assuming that SEI is formed by a reaction between intercalated Li and the electrolyte in SEI on the negative carbon surface, and a diffusion of the electrolyte in the SEI is the rate-determining step of the reaction. The theoretical equation showed a good agreement with experimental capacity fade at 25, 40, and 60°C for the storing days up to 380 days. A voltage decrease of the cell after 1-s at 20 A of discharge current was measured to estimate roughly the increase of the cell internal resistance during storage. The increase of SEI resistance was estimated by the theoretical equation and compared with the experimental voltage drop data after 1-s discharge. However, the theoretical data was not in a good agreement with the experimental data. The reason is that the charge-transfer resistance on the anode also increases during storage. Another reason is the resistance change of the cathode during the storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Arora, P., White, R. E., & Doyle, M. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838857 · Cited by 1,408
Symmetric cell approach and impedance spectroscopy of high power lithium-ion batteries
Chen, C. H., Liu, J., & Amine, K. (2001) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(00)00666-2 · Cited by 347
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Generation and Evolution of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Heiskanen, S. K., Kim, J., & Lucht, B. L. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018 · Cited by 1,036
A Growing Appreciation for the Role of LiF in the Solid Electrolyte Interphase
Tan, J., Matz, J., Dong, P., Shen, J., & Ye, M. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100046 · Cited by 1,019
Lithium Batteries and the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI)—Progress and Outlook
Adenusi, H., Chass, G. A., Passerini, S., Tian, K. V., & Chen, G. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202203307 · Cited by 830
Identifying the components of the solid–electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries
Wang, L., Menakath, A., Han, F., Wang, Y., Zavalij, P. Y., Gaskell, K. J., Borodin, O., Iuga, D., Brown, S. P., Wang, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshida, T., Takahashi, M., Morikawa, S., Ihara, C., Katsukawa, H., Shiratsuchi, T., & Yamaki, J.-I.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- A576
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019525562
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.2162467
- The paper
- Yoshida, T., Takahashi, M., Morikawa, S., Ihara, C., Katsukawa, H., Shiratsuchi, T., & Yamaki, J.-I. (2006). Degradation Mechanism and Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2162467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.