Cited by 329Analytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsElectrochemical Analysis and Applications

Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis

Open access
Feigl, F., Anger, V., Koslow, Ralf H.·1973·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.2403827

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Feigl, F., Anger, V., & Koslow, R. H.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
1973
Volume
120
Issue
8
Pages
261C
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237540107
Cited by
329
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Keywords
spot test, inorganic analysis, qualitative analysis, cation recognition, anion identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review