Water Dynamics in a PEM Fuel Cell: Effect of Current and Humidity Transients
Open accessAbstract
The water dynamics of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) of a 50 cm2 polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell was studied in response to current and humidity step transients as a function of inlet relative humidity (RH) and cell operating temperature. MEA water content change was monitored by high frequency resistance (HFR) and in situ neutron imaging. The MEA "wetting" response was significantly faster (10-30 seconds) than the reciprocal "drying" response (several minutes). The wetting response to increasing current appears faster than that to increasing gas inlet RH. Wetting and drying responses to gas inlet RH transients are greater at low current densities showing the dominating effect of current wetting over gas inlet humidity effects. Operating the fuel cell at 40oC with no inlet gas humidification, a current wetting response was observed and 34 amps of current sustained. This showed that reaction water produced at the cathode is sufficient to support high current density if the drying effect of inlet gases is low. It also suggests that back diffusion of reaction water to the MEA is sufficient to account for the fast drop in HFR. In situ neutron imaging results show that GDL wetting is also faster than drying but on a slower time scale than that for the MEA. However, MEA and GDL drying are on a similar slow time scale and are coupled because water diffusing out of the MEA must move through the GDLs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For more modern, thinner membranes, equilibration following galvanostatic steps or rapid changes in inlet humidity is empirically expected to be significantly more rapid (≤1 min).
“for which equilibration following galvanostatic steps or rapid changes in inlet humidity is empirically expected to be significantly more rapid (≤1 min, see e.g., [131] with some variation reported between wetting and drying).”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [131]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickinson, E. J. F., & Smith, G. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10110310 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davey, J., Mukundan, R., Spendelow, J., Hussey, D. S., Jacobson, D., Arif, M., & Borup, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Venue
- ECS Transactions
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2008-10-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-340
- ISSN
- 1938-5862 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-6737
- OpenAlex
- W2313770225
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ECS Transactions (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE_AI01-01EE50660)
- U.S. Department of Commerce (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
- NIST Center for Neutron Research (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
- Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Keywords
- proton exchange membrane fuel cells, water dynamics, membrane electrode assembly, high-frequency resistance, gas diffusion layer, operating temperature, current density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review