Cited by 4Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Water Dynamics in a PEM Fuel Cell: Effect of Current and Humidity Transients

Open access
Davey, John, Mukundan, R., Spendelow, Jacob, Hussey, Daniel S., Jacobson, David, Arif, Muhammad, Borup, Rodney L.·2008·ECS Transactions

Abstract

The water dynamics of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) of a 50 cm2 polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell was studied in response to current and humidity step transients as a function of inlet relative humidity (RH) and cell operating temperature. MEA water content change was monitored by high frequency resistance (HFR) and in situ neutron imaging. The MEA "wetting" response was significantly faster (10-30 seconds) than the reciprocal "drying" response (several minutes). The wetting response to increasing current appears faster than that to increasing gas inlet RH. Wetting and drying responses to gas inlet RH transients are greater at low current densities showing the dominating effect of current wetting over gas inlet humidity effects. Operating the fuel cell at 40oC with no inlet gas humidification, a current wetting response was observed and 34 amps of current sustained. This showed that reaction water produced at the cathode is sufficient to support high current density if the drying effect of inlet gases is low. It also suggests that back diffusion of reaction water to the MEA is sufficient to account for the fast drop in HFR. In situ neutron imaging results show that GDL wetting is also faster than drying but on a slower time scale than that for the MEA. However, MEA and GDL drying are on a similar slow time scale and are coupled because water diffusing out of the MEA must move through the GDLs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.2981867

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For more modern, thinner membranes, equilibration following galvanostatic steps or rapid changes in inlet humidity is empirically expected to be significantly more rapid (≤1 min).

    “for which equilibration following galvanostatic steps or rapid changes in inlet humidity is empirically expected to be significantly more rapid (≤1 min, see e.g., [131] with some variation reported between wetting and drying).”

Authors
Davey, J., Mukundan, R., Spendelow, J., Hussey, D. S., Jacobson, D., Arif, M., & Borup, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
ECS Transactions
Published
2008-10-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
329-340
ISSN
  • 1938-5862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-6737
OpenAlex
W2313770225
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ECS Transactions (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE_AI01-01EE50660)
  • U.S. Department of Commerce (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  • NIST Center for Neutron Research (DE-AI01-01EE50660)
  • Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, water dynamics, membrane electrode assembly, high-frequency resistance, gas diffusion layer, operating temperature, current density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review