Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A High Precision Study of the Coulombic Efficiency of Li-Ion Batteries

Open access
Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., Dahn, J. R.·2010·Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters

Abstract

The capacity loss and coulombic efficiency of , , and commercial Li-ion batteries have been examined using high precision coulometry. The cells were charged and discharged at different C rates and temperatures to observe trends in the aging of cells. The experiments show that time, not cycle count, is the dominant contributor to the coulombic inefficiency of Li-ion batteries cycled at low rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.3487637

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., & Dahn, J. R.
Venue
Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters
Published
2010
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
A177
ISSN
1099-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082753519
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A High Precision Study of the Coulombic Efficiency of Li-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.3487637
The paper
Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., & Dahn, J. R. (2010). A High Precision Study of the Coulombic Efficiency of Li-Ion Batteries. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3487637

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.