Influence of Equivalent Weight of Ionomer on Proton Conduction Behavior in Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers
Open accessAbstract
Although the properties of Nafion membranes (10 to 100s μm thick) have been well studied for decades, understanding of nano-sized Nafion ionomer is rather limited, which hampers the further improvement of fuel cell catalyst layers. In this work, ultrathin Nafion film on SiO 2 model substrate is prepared via self-assembly method to represent the ionomer in fuel-cell catalyst layers, which allows the accurate characterization of the proton conductivity and microstructure of the ionomer. Proton conductivity measurements of Nafion films with different ionomer equivalent weights demonstrate that the ionomer with lower equivalent weight possesses higher proton conductivity. The measured catalyst layer electrolyte resistances decrease with decreasing ionomer equivalent weights, as expected. It is found that the confinement environment of Nafion ionomer results in a loss of microphase separation, which can be alleviated by lower equivalent weight ionomer that in turn improves the ion mobility, and thus promoting proton conduction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ionomers with lower equivalent weights possess higher proton conductivity but are sensitive to water.
“Usually, ionomers with lower equivalent weights (EWs) possess higher proton conductivity [183] but are sensitive to water.”
From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [183]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly
Mo, S., Du, L., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wu, P., Meng, L., Wang, N., Xing, L., Zhao, M., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“Usually, ionomers with lower equivalent weights (EWs) possess higher proton conductivity [183] but are sensitive to water.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Shen, S., Han, A., Yan, X., Chen, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- F724-F728
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2958290053
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (21706158)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0101201)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Keywords
- Nafion ionomer, equivalent weight, proton conductivity, fuel cell catalyst layers, self-assembly, electrolyte resistance, microphase separation, ion mobility, confinement effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review