The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen Crossover in PEM and Alkaline Water Electrolysis: Mechanisms, Direct Comparison and Mitigation Strategies
Abstract
This study provides a direct comparison of hydrogen crossover in PEM (Nafion 117) and alkaline water electrolysis (Zirfon) at a temperature of applying state-of-the-art separating unit materials. To this end, occurring crossover mechanisms are described first, before experimental data of the anodic hydrogen content are shown in dependence of current density, system pressure and process management strategy. The results suggest that permeation in PEM electrolyzers is mainly governed by diffusion due to a supersaturated concentration of dissolved hydrogen within the catalyst layer, showing a share of 98} of the total permeation flux at and atmospheric pressure. Permeation in alkaline electrolyzers also exhibits a significant influence of supersaturation, but the overall crossover is mainly influenced by mixing the electrolyte cycles, which makes up a share of 90} at and . Generally it becomes evident that hydrogen permeation across the separating unit is more than one order of magnitude smaller in alkaline electrolysis, which is mainly a consequence of the significantly lower hydrogen solubility in concentrated KOH electrolyte. Finally, this study concludes with an assessment of the impact of separating unit thickness and provides mitigation strategies to reduce hydrogen crossover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alkaline Water Electrolysis Powered by Renewable Energy: A Review
Brauns, J., & Turek, T. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8020248 · Cited by 817
Self-citationPrecious Metal Free Hydrogen Evolution Catalyst Design and Application
Feidenhans’l, A. A., Regmi, Y. N., Wei, C., Xia, D., Kibsgaard, J., & King, L. A. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00712 · Cited by 499
Water Electrolysis toward Elevated Temperature: Advances, Challenges and Frontiers
Zhang, W., Liu, M., Gu, X., Shi, Y., Deng, Z., & Cai, N. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00573 · Cited by 441
Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks
Krishnan, S., Koning, V., Theodorus de Groot, M., de Groot, A., Mendoza, P. G., Junginger, M., & Kramer, G. J. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.031 · Cited by 339
A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical modeling
Hu, S., Guo, B., Ding, S., Yang, F., Dang, J., Liu, B., Gu, J., Ma, J., & Ouyang, M. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120099 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Trinke, P., Haug, P., Brauns, J., Bensmann, B., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., & Turek, T.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- F502-F513
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2803118351
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen Crossover in PEM and Alkaline Water Electrolysis: Mechanisms, Direct Comparison and Mitigation Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.0541807jes
- The paper
- Trinke, P., Haug, P., Brauns, J., Bensmann, B., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., & Turek, T. (2018). Hydrogen Crossover in PEM and Alkaline Water Electrolysis: Mechanisms, Direct Comparison and Mitigation Strategies. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0541807jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.