The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks
Open accessAbstract
We use complementary bottom-up and top-down approaches to assess the current cost of AE and PEM stacks and how the costs are expected to come down by 2030. The total AE and PEM stack cost reduce from a range of 242–388 €/kW and 384–1071 €/kW in 2020 to 52–79 €/kW and 63–234 €/kW in 2030 respectively. The main drivers of these cost reductions are an increased current density and a reduction and/or replacement of expensive materials with cheaper alternatives. To a lesser extent, manufacturing and labor costs reduction is expected due to mass manufacturing at a GW scale. The total cost decrease is less prominent for AE than PEM due to AE's maturity. The uncertainty range for PEM stacks is due to the low TRL associated with the advanced design PEM stack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A., Nelson, J., & Few, S. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045 · Cited by 2,067
Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen
Glenk, G., & Reichelstein, S. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0326-1 · Cited by 1,360
The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates
Schmidt, O., Hawkes, A., Gambhir, A., & Staffell, I. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.110 · Cited by 1,134
Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy
Haegel, N. M., Atwater, H., Barnes, T., Breyer, C., Burrell, A., Chiang, Y.-M., De Wolf, S., Dimmler, B., Feldman, D., Glunz, S., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1845 · Cited by 560
Is iridium demand a potential bottleneck in the realization of large-scale PEM water electrolysis?
Minke, C., Suermann, M., Bensmann, B., & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.174 · Cited by 478
Electrochemical Energy Storage for Renewable Sources and Grid Balancing
(2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-01253-7 · Cited by 435
Trinke, P., Haug, P., Brauns, J., Bensmann, B., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., & Turek, T. (2018) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0541807jes · Cited by 337
Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers
Mayyas, A., Ruth, M., Pivovar, B., Bender, G., & Wipke, K. (2019) · doi:10.2172/1557965 · Cited by 310
Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry
(1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6687-8 · Cited by 302
Proost, J. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.164 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, S., Koning, V., Theodorus de Groot, M., de Groot, A., Mendoza, P. G., Junginger, M., & Kramer, G. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 83
- Pages
- 32313-32330
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4377157503
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 15.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.031
- The paper
- Krishnan, S., Koning, V., Theodorus de Groot, M., de Groot, A., Mendoza, P. G., Junginger, M., & Kramer, G. J. (2023). Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
