The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Voltage Losses in PEM Water Electrolyzers with Low Platinum Group Metal Loadings
Open accessAbstract
In this study, the influence of catalyst loading on the performance of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolyzer is investigated (Nafion 212 membrane; IrO 2 /TiO 2 (anode) and Pt/C (cathode)). Due to the fast kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) on platinum (Pt), the Pt loading on the cathode can be reduced from 0.30 mg Pt cm −2 to 0.025 mg Pt cm −2 without any negative effect on performance. On the anode, the iridium (Ir) loading was varied between 0.20–5.41 mg Ir cm −2 and an optimum in performance at operational current densities (≥1 A cm −2 ) was found for 1–2 mg Ir cm −2 . At higher Ir loadings, the performance decreases at high current densities due to insufficient water transport through the catalyst layer whereas at Ir loadings <0.5 mg Ir cm −2 the catalyst layer becomes inhomogeneous, which leads to a lower electrochemically active area and catalyst utilization, resulting in a significant decrease of performance. To investigate the potential for a large-scale application of PEM water electrolysis, the Ir-specific power density (g Ir kW −1 ) for membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) with different catalyst loadings is analyzed as a function of voltage efficiency, and the consequences regarding catalyst material requirements are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model
Springer, T. E., Zawodzinski, T. A., & Gottesfeld, S. (1991) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2085971 · Cited by 3,528
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Environment: Material Challenges and Solutions
Xie, X., Du, L., Yan, L., Park, S., Qiu, Y., Sokolowski, J., Wang, W., & Shao, Y. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202110036 · Cited by 792
Bareiß, K., de la Rua, C., Möckl, M., & Hamacher, T. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001 · Cited by 587
Lazaridis, T., Stühmeier, B. M., Gasteiger, H. A., & El-Sayed, H. A. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00776-5 · Cited by 396
Self-citationBubble Engineering on Micro-/Nanostructured Electrodes for Water Splitting
Li, M., Xie, P., Yu, L., Luo, L., & Sun, X. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c08831 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernt, M., Siebel, A., & Gasteiger, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- F305-F314
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2795115153
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Voltage Losses in PEM Water Electrolyzers with Low Platinum Group Metal Loadings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.0641805jes
- The paper
- Bernt, M., Siebel, A., & Gasteiger, H. A. (2018). Analysis of Voltage Losses in PEM Water Electrolyzers with Low Platinum Group Metal Loadings. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0641805jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.