Cited by 69Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesAdvancements in Battery Materials

A New Method for Determining the Concentration of Electrolyte Components in Lithium-Ion Cells, Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Machine Learning

Open access
Ellis, L. D., Buteau, S., Hames, Samuel G., Thompson, L. M., Hall, D. S., Dahn, J. R.·2018·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

A new method is introduced for determining unknown concentrations of major components in typical lithium-ion battery electrolytes. The method is quick, cheap, and accurate. Machine learning techniques are used to match features of the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of an unknown electrolyte to the same features of a database of FTIR spectra with known compositions. With this method, LiPF 6 concentrations can be determined with similar accuracy and precision as an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) method. The ratios of organic carbonate solvent species can be determined with more rapidity than gas chromatography (GC). This FTIR method is faster and less expensive than GC and ICP-OES, and has the added benefit of being able to determine LiPF 6 concentration and solvent fractions simultaneously. Application of this tool can facilitate electrolyte analysis of aged lithium-ion cells, and will help elucidate mechanisms for cell degradation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/2.0861802jes

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Work in battery ML has focused on predicting battery state, degradation, and remaining lifetime using supervised learning, fuzzy logic, and clustering.

    “Work in this area has focused on predicting battery state, degradation, and remaining lifetime using supervised learning techniques, fuzzy logic, and clustering [42,104,218,358,414,725,735,819,854].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [218]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. E. Peled, D. Bar Tow, A. Merson, A. Gladkich, L. Burstein, and D. Golodnitsky, Proc. 10th Int. Meet. Lithium Batter., 97-98, 52 (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, L. D., Buteau, S., Hames, S. G., Thompson, L. M., Hall, D. S., & Dahn, J. R.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2018
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
A256-A262
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2794381681
Cited by
69
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
lithium-ion battery electrolytes, FTIR spectroscopy, electrolyte analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review