Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 207 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review—Post-Mortem Analysis of Aged Lithium-Ion Batteries: Disassembly Methodology and Physico-Chemical Analysis Techniques

Open access
Waldmann, Thomas, Iturrondobeitia, Amaia, Kasper, Michael, Ghanbari, Niloofar, Aguesse, Frédéric, Bekaert, Emilie, Daniel, Lise, Genies, Sylvie, Gordon, Isabel Jiménez, Löble, Matthias W., De Vito, Eric, Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, Margret·2016·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

Improvement of life-time is an important issue in the development of Li-ion batteries. Aging mechanisms limiting the life-time can efficiently be characterized by physico-chemical analysis of aged cells with a variety of complementary methods. This study reviews the state-of-the-art literature on Post-Mortem analysis of Li-ion cells, including disassembly methodology as well as physico-chemical characterization methods for battery materials. A detailed scheme for Post-Mortem analysis is deduced from literature, including pre-inspection, conditions and safe environment for disassembly of cells, as well as separation and post-processing of components. Special attention is paid to the characterization of aged materials including anodes, cathodes, separators, and electrolyte. More specifically, microscopy, chemical methods sensitive to electrode surfaces or to electrode bulk, and electrolyte analysis are reviewed in detail. The techniques are complemented by electrochemical measurements using reconstruction methods for electrodes built into half and full cells with reference electrode. The changes happening to the materials during aging as well as abilities of the reviewed analysis methods to observe them are critically discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/2.1211609jes

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 207 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Waldmann, T., Iturrondobeitia, A., Kasper, M., Ghanbari, N., Aguesse, F., Bekaert, E., Daniel, L., Genies, S., Gordon, I. J., Löble, M. W., De Vito, E., & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2016
Volume
163
Issue
10
Pages
A2149-A2164
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2488736197
Cited by
328
References
207
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review—Post-Mortem Analysis of Aged Lithium-Ion Batteries: Disassembly Methodology and Physico-Chemical Analysis Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.1211609jes
The paper
Waldmann, T., Iturrondobeitia, A., Kasper, M., Ghanbari, N., Aguesse, F., Bekaert, E., Daniel, L., Genies, S., Gordon, I. J., Löble, M. W., De Vito, E., & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. (2016). Review—Post-Mortem Analysis of Aged Lithium-Ion Batteries: Disassembly Methodology and Physico-Chemical Analysis Techniques. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1211609jes

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.