Cited by 109Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationAnatomy and Medical Technology

The use of virtual patients in medical school curricula

Open access
Cendan, Juan, Lok, Benjamin·2012·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

The demonstration of patient-based cases using automated technology [virtual patients (VPs)] has been available to health science educators for a number of decades. Despite the promise of VPs as an easily accessible and moldable platform, their widespread acceptance and integration into medical curricula have been slow. Here, the authors review the technological underpinnings of VPs, summarize the literature regarding the use and limitations of VPs in the healthcare curriculum, describe novel possible applications of the technology, and propose possible directions for future work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.00054.2011

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Virtual Patient has been part of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE Step 3) since 1999.

    “In addition, it is part of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE Step 3) since 1999 [13, 14].”
  • The Virtual Patient has been accepted by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) as a resource to teach rare but necessary clinical situations.

    “This tool has been accepted by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) as a resource to teach rare but necessary clinical situations [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cendan, J., & Lok, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Cendan, Juan
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2012-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
48-53
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W2155859429
Cited by
109
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM010813, R01-LM-010813-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
virtual patients, medical education, medical curriculum, clinical case-based learning, educational technology
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Patients, Students, Medical, User-Computer Interface, Visible Human Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review