The effectiveness of combining e-learning, peer teaching, and flipped classroom for delivering a physiology laboratory course to nursing students
Open accessAbstract
The Internet and 5G era makes e-learning a vital part of modern education, and extensive evidence has shown that peer teaching and flipped classroom contribute to increased success in medical teaching. However, the applicability of these pedagogies in laboratory courses remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the academic performance, proficiency in procedural skills, and perception of nursing students in physiology laboratory classes delivered with nontraditional classroom (NTC) pedagogies comprising the combination of e-learning, peer teaching, and flipped classroom. Each class was subdivided into two equal halves by successive student identification (ID) number and randomly assigned to the control or NTC group. Compared to the control class, NTC teaching significantly enhanced mean score of six preclass tests (67.77 ± 9.83 vs. 62.94 ± 9.70), with “B” graders increased obviously, suggesting that preclass e-learning was more effective than textbook-based preview, especially for general grasp of the topic. Similarly, average scores on postclass quizzes in the NTC group were improved (79.40 ± 9.12 vs. 74.43 ± 8.88). Lesser time cost and higher success rates were observed in trachea, artery, and heart catheterizations in the NTC group, although no disparities were found in ureteral intubation. The majority (∼74%) of students supported the reform and shared positive experiences with NTC methodology. They reported that virtual experiments and self-paced procedural skill videos affected pre- and in-class learning outcomes most, respectively. These findings indicated that NTC pedagogy was workable to improve students’ subject scores and proficiency in complicated and direct-viewing procedural skills and was favorable to students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies in the meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks; one lasted half a semester and two lasted only a few days.
“Most of the studies in our meta-analysis were conducted within 8 weeks (Cabi & Emine, 2018;Karabatak & Polat, 2020;Meng et al., 2022;Muzyk et al., 2015;Senousy et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022;Wilson & Hobbs, 2023), and one studies lasted for half a semester (Chien & Hsieh, 2018) and two studies only lasted for a few days (Arya et al., 2020;Casselman et al., 2020).”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Meng et al., 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meng, X.-H., Xu, X.-Y., Chen, H.-L., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- Ningbo College of Health Sciences (CN)
- Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (CN)
- Department of Medical Technology, Ningbo College of Health Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
- Corresponding author
- Meng, Xiang-hong
- Venue
- Advances in Physiology Education
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2022-03-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-26
- ISSN
- 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1229
- OpenAlex
- W3202493136
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Zhejiang education research project (Y201738580)
- Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (2017A610200)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Keywords
- online learning, peer teaching, flipped classroom, physiology laboratory, nursing students, procedural skills, virtual experiments, student perceptions, academic performance
- MeSH terms
- Computer-Assisted Instruction, Curriculum, Humans, Laboratories, Students, Nursing, Teaching, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review