Cited by 169Ion Transport and Channel RegulationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

Astrocytes from Na+-K+-Cl−cotransporter-null mice exhibit absence of swelling and decrease in EAA release

Su, Gui, Kintner, Douglas B., Flagella, Michael, Shull, Gary E., Sun, Dandan·2002·American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology

Abstract

We reported previously that inhibition of Na+-K+-Cl− cotransporter isoform 1 (NKCC1) by bumetanide abolishes high extracellular K+concentration ([K+]o)-induced swelling and intracellular Cl− accumulation in rat cortical astrocytes. In this report, we extended our study by using cortical astrocytes from NKCC1-deficient (NKCC1−/−) mice. NKCC1 protein and activity were absent in NKCC1−/− astrocytes. [K+]o of 75 mM increased NKCC1 activity approximately fourfold in NKCC1+/+ cells ( P< 0.05) but had no effect in NKCC1−/− astrocytes. Intracellular Cl− was increased by 70% in NKCC1+/+ astrocytes under 75 mM [K+]o ( P < 0.05) but remained unchanged in NKCC1−/− astrocytes. Baseline intracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+]i) in NKCC1+/+ astrocytes was 19.0 ± 0.5 mM, compared with 16.9 ± 0.3 mM [Na+]i in NKCC1−/− astrocytes ( P < 0.05). Relative cell volume of NKCC1+/+ astrocytes increased by 13 ± 2% in 75 mM [K+]o, compared with a value of 1.0 ± 0.5% in NKCC1−/− astrocytes ( P < 0.05). Regulatory volume increase after hypertonic shrinkage was completely impaired in NKCC1−/− astrocytes. High-[K+]o-induced 14 C-labeledd-aspartate release was reduced by ∼30% in NKCC1−/− astrocytes. Our study suggests that stimulation of NKCC1 is required for high-[K+]o-induced swelling, which contributes to glutamate release from astrocytes under high [K+]o.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpcell.00538.2001

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abrupt shifts of the sleep period induce a profound disruption in the daily cortisol rhythm.

    “Abrupt shifts of the sleep period induce a profound disruption in the daily cortisol rhythm”
  • In the first postshift period after the advance, no significant changes were found in the acrophase value.

    “No significant changes were found in the acrophase value.”
  • In the first postshift period after the advance, no shift in the timing of the acrophase occurred, and the duration of the rising phase of cortisol secretion was increased by nearly 3 hours and presented a biphasic pattern.

    “No shift in the timing of the acrophase occurred, thus the duration of the rising phase of cortisol secretion was increased by nearly 3 hours and presented a biphasic pattern.”
  • In the first postshift period after the advance, slight increases in nadir values resulted in a trend toward higher 24-hour mean cortisol levels.

    “These changes, together with the slight increase in the nadir values, resulted in a trend toward higher 24-hour mean levels.”
  • In the first postshift period after an acute 8-hour advance of the rest-activity cycle, the timing of the nadir was advanced by about 3 hours and 20 minutes, and the quiescent period was markedly reduced mainly due to an advance of the offset by more than 3 hours.

    “In the first postshift period, compared with the baseline profile, the timing of the nadir was advanced by about 3 hours and 20 minutes; the quiescent period was markedly reduced mainly due to an advance of the offset by more than 3 hours.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, G., Kintner, D. B., Flagella, M., Shull, G. E., & Sun, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Departments of Neurosurgery and
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
282
Issue
5
Pages
C1147-C1160
ISSN
  • 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1563
OpenAlex
W2103230981
Cited by
169
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK050594, R01DK-50594)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS-38118, R01NS038118)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Keywords
Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter, NKCC1, astrocytes, cell swelling, high extracellular potassium, intracellular sodium, glutamate release, D-aspartate, bumetanide, cortical astrocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Aspartic Acid, Astrocytes, Bumetanide, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Chlorides, Diuretics, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Potassium, Sodium, 4,4'-Diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-Disulfonic Acid, Mice, Knockout, Glutamic Acid, Sodium-Potassium-Chloride Symporters, Cell Size, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review