Resistance exercise induced mTORC1 signaling is not impaired by subsequent endurance exercise in human skeletal muscle
Abstract
The current dogma is that the muscle adaptation to resistance exercise is blunted when combined with endurance exercise. The suggested mechanism (based on rodent experiments) is that activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) during endurance exercise impairs muscle growth through inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). The purpose of this study was to investigate potential interference of endurance training on the signaling pathway of resistance training [mTORC1 phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1)] in human muscle. Ten healthy and moderately trained male subjects performed on two separate occasions either acute high-intensity and high-volume resistance exercise (leg press, R) or R followed by 30 min of cycling (RE). Muscle biopsies were collected before and 1 and 3 h post resistance exercise. Phosphorylation of mTOR (Ser²⁴⁴⁸) increased 2-fold (P < 0.05) and that of S6K1 (Thr³⁸⁹) 14-fold (P < 0.05), with no difference between R and RE. Phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2, Thr⁵⁶) was reduced ~70% during recovery in both trials (P < 0.05). An interesting finding was that phosphorylation of AMPK (Thr¹⁷²) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC, Ser⁷⁹) decreased ~30% and ~50%, respectively, 3 h postexercise (P < 0.05). Proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 (PGC-1α) mRNA increased more after RE (6.5-fold) than after R (4-fold) (RE vs. R: P < 0.01) and was the only gene expressed differently between trials. These data show that the signaling of muscle growth through the mTORC1-S6K1 axis after heavy resistance exercise is not inhibited by subsequent endurance exercise. It is also suggested that prior activation of mTORC1 signaling may repress subsequent phosphorylation of AMPK.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Apro et al. (2013) found that activation of mTORC1 by resistance exercise was not impaired by subsequent concurrent endurance exercise.
“Activation of the mTORC1 by resistance exercise was not impaired by subsequent concurrent endurance exercise.”
From Skeletal Muscle Ribosome and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Response to Different Exercise Training Modalities (2021) · cites this paper as Apro et al. (2013)
Apro et al. (2013) found that phosphorylation of AMPK was decreased 3 hours after both resistance exercise-only and concurrent exercise, suggesting that prior activation of mTORC may suppress AMPK activation.
“However, the authors found that phosphorylation of AMPK was decreased 3h after both resistance exercise-only and concurrent exercise, suggesting that prior activation of mTORC may suppress AMPK activation.”
From Skeletal Muscle Ribosome and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Response to Different Exercise Training Modalities (2021) · cites this paper as Apro et al. (2013)
A low-intensity endurance session will not affect signaling pathways regulating strength gains.
“the low-intensity session will not affect signaling pathways regulating strength gains [51–53].”
From Using Molecular Biology to Maximize Concurrent Training (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Apró et al. [53] reported no decrease in mTOR signaling when subjects performed 30 min of cycling at 70% VO2max 15 min after resistance training.
“Apró and colleagues did not report any decrease in mTOR signaling when subjects performed 30 min of cycling at 70 % of VO2max 15 min after completing a resistance training session [53].”
From Using Molecular Biology to Maximize Concurrent Training (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Other studies show similar or enhanced signaling and gene responses with concurrent exercise compared with single-mode exercise in moderately trained or recreationally active individuals.
“The impact of exercise order notwithstanding, other studies have compared molecular responses of combined endurance and resistance exercise versus single-mode exercise and show similar or enhanced signaling and gene responses with concurrent exercise in moderately trained or recreationally active individuals (Apro et al., 2013;Lundberg et al., 2014b;Apro et al., 2015;Kazior et al., 2016).”
From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Apro et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Apró, W., Wang, L., Pontén, M., Blomstrand, E., & Sahlin, K.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Apró, William
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- E22-E32
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2080251395
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- resistance training, endurance exercise, mTORC1 signaling, S6K1 phosphorylation, AMPK, PGC-1α, eEF2 phosphorylation, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, skeletal muscle hypertrophy, muscle growth, leg press, cycling
- MeSH terms
- Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Adenylate Kinase, Adult, Humans, Male, Mitochondria, Phosphorylation, Physical Endurance, Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Exercise, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Muscle, Skeletal, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Multiprotein Complexes, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Resistance Training, Young Adult, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review