Resistance exercise-induced S6K1 kinase activity is not inhibited in human skeletal muscle despite prior activation of AMPK by high-intensity interval cycling
Open accessAbstract
Combining endurance and strength training in the same session has been reported to reduce the anabolic response to the latter form of exercise. The underlying mechanism, based primarily on results from rodent muscle, is proposed to involve AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTORC1 signaling. This hypothesis was tested in eight trained male subjects who in randomized order performed either resistance exercise only (R) or interval cycling followed by resistance exercise (ER). Biopsies taken from the vastus lateralis before and after endurance exercise and repeatedly after resistance exercise were assessed for glycogen content, kinase activity, protein phosphorylation, and gene expression. Mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate was measured at rest and during 3 h of recovery using the stable isotope technique. In ER, AMPK activity was elevated immediately after both endurance and resistance exercise (∼90%, P < 0.05) but was unchanged in R. Thr 389 phosphorylation of S6K1 was increased severalfold immediately after exercise ( P < 0.05) in both trials and increased further throughout recovery. After 90 and 180 min recovery, S6K1 activity was elevated (∼55 and ∼110%, respectively, P < 0.05) and eukaryotic elongation factor 2 phosphorylation was reduced (∼55%, P < 0.05) with no difference between trials. In contrast, markers for protein catabolism were differently influenced by the two modes of exercise; ER induced a significant increase in gene and protein expression of MuRF1 ( P < 0.05), which was not observed following R exercise only. In conclusion, cycling-induced elevation in AMPK activity does not inhibit mTOR complex 1 signaling after subsequent resistance exercise but may instead interfere with the hypertrophic response by influencing key components in protein breakdown.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies show similar or enhanced signaling and gene responses with concurrent exercise compared with single-mode exercise in moderately trained or recreationally active individuals.
“The impact of exercise order notwithstanding, other studies have compared molecular responses of combined endurance and resistance exercise versus single-mode exercise and show similar or enhanced signaling and gene responses with concurrent exercise in moderately trained or recreationally active individuals (Apro et al., 2013;Lundberg et al., 2014b;Apro et al., 2015;Kazior et al., 2016).”
From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Apro et al., 2015
Elevated AMPK activity does not suppress mTOR mediated signaling when endurance exercise is undertaken prior to resistance exercise.
“Furthermore, elevated AMPK activity does not supress mTOR mediated signaling when endurance exercise is undertaken prior to resistance exercise (Apro et al., 2015).”
From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Apro et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Apró, W., Moberg, M., Hamilton, D. L., Ekblom, B., van Hall, G., Holmberg, H.-C., & Blomstrand, E.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Åstrand Laboratory, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden;
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Mid Sweden University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Apró, William
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2015-03-15
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E470-E481
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2070011200
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Natinal Centre for Research in Sports (CIF P2012-0114)
- Karolinska Institutet (2011 FoBi0780)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Keywords
- resistance training, AMPK, mTORC1 signaling, eEF2 phosphorylation, endurance exercise, muscle hypertrophy, protein degradation, MuRF1, muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, vastus lateralis, post-exercise recovery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bicycling, Enzyme Activation, Glycogen, Humans, Male, Protein Binding, Up-Regulation, Muscle, Skeletal, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Resistance Training, AMP-Activated Protein Kinases, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review