Insulin sensitivity index in type 1 diabetes and following human islet transplantation: comparison of the minimal model to euglycemic clamp measures
Open accessAbstract
Insulin sensitivity is impaired in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and may be enhanced by islet transplantation, an effect best explained by improved metabolic control. While the minimal model index of insulin sensitivity, S I, has been used in studies of T1D, it has not before been evaluated against gold-standard measures derived from the euglycemic clamp. We sought to determine how well minimal model S I derived from an insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test compared with total body and peripheral insulin sensitivity estimates derived from the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp in subjects with T1D and following islet transplantation. Twenty-one T1D subjects were evaluated, including a subgroup ( n = 12) studied again after intrahepatic islet transplantation, with results compared with normal controls ( n = 11 for the FSIGT). The transplant recipients received 9,648 ± 666 islet equivalents/kg with reduction in HbA 1c from 7.1 ± 0.2 to 5.5 ± 0.1% ( P < 0.01) and 10/12 were insulin independent. FSIGT-derived S I was reduced in T1D pre- compared with posttransplant and with normal [1.76 ± 0.45 vs. 4.21 ± 0.34 vs. 4.45 ± 0.81 × 10−4(μU/ml)−1·min−1; P < 0.01 for both]. Similarly, clamp-derived total body, and by the isotopic dilution method with [6,6-2 H 2]glucose, peripheral insulin sensitivity increased in T1D from pre- to posttransplant ( P < 0.05 for both). The predictive power ( r 2) between volume-corrected S IC and measures of total and peripheral insulin sensitivity was 0.66 and 0.70, respectively ( P < 0.00001 for both). That the minimal model S IC is highly correlated to the clamp-derived measures indicates that the FSIGT is an appropriate methodology for the determination of insulin sensitivity in T1D and following islet transplantation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A similar relationship between the insulin sensitivity of people with and without T1D was investigated by Rickels et al. [23] in a euglycemic clamp study.
“A similar relationship between the insulin sensitivity of people with and without T1D was investigated by Rickels et al. [23] in a euglycemic clamp study.”
From A statistical virtual patient population for the glucoregulatory system in type 1 diabetes with integrated exercise model (2019) · cites this paper as Rickels et al. [23]
Cites
Menstrual Cycle Effects on Insulin Sensitivity in Women with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
Trout, K. K., Rickels, M. R., Schutta, M. H., Petrova, M., Freeman, E. W., Tkacs, N. C., & Teff, K. L. (2007) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2006.0004 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resalat, N., El Youssef, J., Tyler, N., Castle, J., & Jacobs, P. G. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217301 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rickels, M. R., Kong, S. M., Fuller, C., Dalton-Bakes, C., Ferguson, J. F., Reilly, M. P., Teff, K. L., & Naji, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rickels, Michael R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-05-15
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- E1217-E1224
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- PMC
- PMC4025062
- OpenAlex
- W2040008137
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dk091331-10, UL1TR000003)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL107643)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-091331, U01DK070430, P30 DK 19525, P30DK019525)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR-00003)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- insulin sensitivity, type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation, minimal model analysis, euglycemic clamp, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, peripheral insulin sensitivity, HbA1c, insulin independence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Glucose Clamp Technique, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review