Abdominal adiposity rather than age and sex predicts mass and regularity of GH secretion in healthy adults
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that body composition is the major predictor of growth hormone (GH) secretion in nonobese adults. We measured lean and fat tissue distribution (computerized tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan) and physical fitness [maximal oxygen consumption (Vo2max)] in 42 healthy nonobese adults (22 women and 20 men, age range 27-59 yr, mean +/- SE body mass index = 24 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). Deconvolution analysis was used to estimate specific features of 24-h GH secretion and clearance. Approximate entropy was used to quantify the regularity of GH release. Older subjects exhibited decreased estimates of GH secretion compared with younger subjects. Females had higher estimates of GH secretion, a longer GH half-life, and displayed more irregularity in GH release than males. Mean 24-h serum GH concentrations correlated inversely with intra-abdominal fat and waist-to-hip ratio and positively with Vo2max. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed intra-abdominal fat as the dominant determinant of estimates of GH secretion. Vo2max was more important than sex and age in predicting GH secretion. We conclude that abdominal fat is the major determinant of GH secretion in healthy nonobese adults. Although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, our findings extend the clinical implications of visceral adiposity to include hyposomatotropism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The daily GH secretion rate varies inversely with estimated abdominal visceral-fat mass in middle-aged men and women.
“The daily GH secretion rate varies inversely with estimated abdominal visceral-fat mass in middle-aged men and women (60).”
From Determinants of dual secretagogue drive of burst-like growth hormone secretion in premenopausal women studied under a selective estradiol clamp (2005) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 178
- Authors
- Vahl, N., Jorgensen, J. O., Skjaerbaek, C., Veldhuis, J. D., Orskov, H., & Christiansen, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Medical Department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes), AarhusKommunehospital, Denmark.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E1108-E1116
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2439101359
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k04hd000634-02)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1-K04-HD-00634)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- growth hormone secretion, abdominal fat, visceral fat, body composition, physical fitness, VO2max, hyposomatotropism, sex differences, age effects, non-obese adults
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aging, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Sex Characteristics, Skin, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Human Growth Hormone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review