Cited by 21Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Determinants of dual secretagogue drive of burst-like growth hormone secretion in premenopausal women studied under a selective estradiol clamp

Open access
Erickson, Dana, Keenan, Daniel M., Farhy, Leon, Mielke, Kristi, Bowers, Cyril Y., Veldhuis, Johannes D.·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The present study tests the hypothesis that estradiol (E(2)), compared with placebo (Pl), amplifies combined-secretagogue stimulation of GH secretion in premenopausal women studied at comparable IGF-I and testosterone concentrations. To this end, 13 women underwent GnRH agonist-induced gonadal down-regulation followed by graded transdermal addback of E(2) or Pl and randomly ordered iv infusions of saline or paired secretagogues on separate morning fasting. GH secretion was assessed by frequent blood sampling, immunochemiluminometry, and variable-waveform deconvolution analysis. Two-way ANOVA revealed that specific secretagogue combination (P < 0.001), E(2) status (P = 0.012), and their interaction (P = 0.038) jointly determined GH secretory-burst mass. Compared with Pl, the E(2)-clamped milieu elevated mean fasting GH concentrations (P = 0.032), the mass of GH secreted in bursts (P = 0.037), and maximal stimulation by paired l-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 (P = 0.028). E(2) also markedly accelerated the initial release of GH induced by GHRH/GHRP-2 (P < 0.001) and l-arginine/GHRH (P < 0.01). By linear regression analysis, E(2) concentrations positively forecast 41% of intersubject variability in GH secretion stimulated by combined l-arginine/GHRP-2 (P = 0.018), whereas abdominal visceral-fat mass negatively predicted 49% of that due to l-arginine/GHRH (P = 0.012). These data indicate that pulsatile GH secretion in young women studied at constant IGF-I and testosterone concentrations is dictated 3-fold jointly by secretagogue pair, E(2) availability, and intraabdominal adiposity. Moreover, the rapidity of GH release is controlled 2-fold jointly by E(2) and GHRH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2004-1621

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 47 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Study design and conductcitation

    The present mathematical structure for the first time allows direct statistical verification of maximum-likelihood estimates.

    “The present mathematical structure for the first time allows direct statistical verification of maximum-likelihood estimates, as validated empirically by in vivo experiments in the horse and sheep (38, 56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] Keenan, 2004, Reconstruction of in vivo time-evolving neuroendocrine dose-response properties unveils admixed deterministic and stochastic elements in interglandular signaling., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source

      Appendix F (page unavailable) describes maximum-likelihood estimation and explicitly computed parameter variances and covariances. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls for statistical verification of the model form and direct experimental validation of parameter estimates; it does not say the structure allows direct statistical verification of maximum-likelihood estimates for the first time. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Keenan, 2001, A feedback-controlled ensemble model of the stress-responsive hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says the model allows estimation of ACTH and cortisol secretion rates and supports computer-assisted predictions and hypothesis testing. Searches for maximum-likelihood estimates and direct statistical verification found no passage establishing that the structure permits such verification for the first time. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The deconvolution solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times.
  • Interpretationcitation

    E2 may upregulate receptor-dependent actions of GHRP.

    “Laboratory data are consistent with a unifying notion that E 2 may upregulate receptor-dependent actions of GHRP.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Shuto, 2002, Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptor regulates growth hormone secretion, feeding, and adiposity., J Clin Invest source
    • cites [54] Horikawa, 2000, Regulation of pituitary growth hormone-secretagogue and growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor RNA expression in young Dwarf rats, Endocr J source

      The Abstract and RNA analysis section report substantially higher pituitary GHSR RNA in female than male dwarf rats and suggest sex-steroid regulation. They do not test E2 or show that it upregulates receptor-dependent responses to GHRP; the measured outcome was receptor RNA expression, not GHRP action. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Kamegai, 1999, Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels during postnatal development in male and female rats., J Neuroendocrinol source
  • Premisecitation

    E2 induces transcription of the human GHRP receptor gene in vitro.

    “and E 2 induces transcription of the human GHRP receptor gene in vitro (23,54,55).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Shuto, 2002, Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptor regulates growth hormone secretion, feeding, and adiposity., J Clin Invest source
    • cites [54] Horikawa, 2000, Regulation of pituitary growth hormone-secretagogue and growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor RNA expression in young Dwarf rats, Endocr J source

      The Abstract and RNA analysis discuss GHSR RNA expression in dwarf-rat pituitaries, including differences between males and females and suppression after GH treatment. A search for E2 or estradiol-induced transcription of the human GHRP receptor gene in vitro found no passage addressing that claim; the rat findings do not establish or contradict it. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Kamegai, 1999, Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels during postnatal development in male and female rats., J Neuroendocrinol source

      The Abstract reports that pituitary GHS-R mRNA levels in rats are associated with changes in the gonadal steroid environment, and suggests that gonadal steroids mediate GHS-R expression. It does not establish that E2 induces transcription of the human GHRP receptor gene in vitro; the species, experimental setting, and causal claim exceed what this paper reports. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Gene transcripts encoding the pituitary GHRP receptor are 2- to 10-fold more abundant in the adult female than male rodent pituitary.

    “gene transcripts encoding the pituitary GHRP receptor are 2to 10-fold more abundant in the adult female than male rodent pituitary”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Shuto, 2002, Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptor regulates growth hormone secretion, feeding, and adiposity., J Clin Invest source
    • cites [54] Horikawa, 2000, Regulation of pituitary growth hormone-secretagogue and growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor RNA expression in young Dwarf rats, Endocr J source

      The RNA analysis reports about tenfold higher pituitary GHSR RNA in female than male spontaneous dwarf rats; the study examined young rats at day 40, not adults. The Discussion also reports that GHSR expression became higher in males in normal rats at day 45. The source therefore does not support the claim’s generalization to adult rodents or its 2-to-10-fold range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Kamegai, 1999, Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels during postnatal development in male and female rats., J Neuroendocrinol source

      The Results report higher pituitary GHS-R mRNA in adult female rats than in males. The reported differences are 89% per whole pituitary and 64% per somatotrope—about 1.9-fold and 1.6-fold—not the claimed 2- to 10-fold range. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    In healthy premenopausal women, E2 administration compared with placebo reduced FSH concentrations 4.8-fold.

    “FSH concentrations were 4.8-fold lower after E 2 than Pl administration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After placebo, relative efficacy of the three secretagogue pairs was GHRH/GHRP-2 = l-arginine/GHRH > l-arginine/GHRP-2.

    “Relative efficacy of the three secretagogue pairs after Pl was GHRH/GHRP-2 ϭ l-arginine/GHRH Ͼ l-arginine/GHRP-2 (P Ͻ 0.05)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The deconvolution solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The peptide doses were chosen as maximally stimulatory in dose-response analyses in women.

    “The foregoing peptide doses were chosen as maximally stimulatory in dose-response analyzes in women (31,33).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Veldhuis, 2002, Impact of estradiol supplementation on dual peptidyl drive of growth-hormone secretion in postmenopausal women., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [33] Veldhuis, 2003, Estradiol supplementation enhances submaximal feed-forward drive of growth hormone (GH) secretion by recombinant human GH-releasing hormone-1,44-amide in a putatively somatostatin-withdrawn milieu., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisecitation
    § Determinants of Dual Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Premenopausal Women Studied under a Selective Estradiol Clamp

    GHRH, SS, and ghrelin constitute a minimal set of regulators to pituitary somatotropes.

    “The idea is that GHRH, SS, and ghrelin constitute a minimal set of regulators to pituitary somatotropes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Giustina, 1998, Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human., Endocr Rev source
    • cites [2] Veldhuis, 2003, Three-peptide control of pulsatile and entropic feedback-sensitive modes of growth hormone secretion: modulation by estrogen and aromatizable androgen, J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] Veldhuis, Endocr Rev source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The order of saline and secretagogue infusions was randomized, placebo controlled, and patient blinded within cohort.

    “The order of saline and secretagogue infusions was also randomized, Pl controlled, and patient blinded within cohort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was a randomized parallel-cohort design.

    “The study was a randomized parallel-cohort design (n ϭ 8 women given E 2 ; n ϭ 5 administered Pl).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Determinants of Dual Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Premenopausal Women Studied under a Selective Estradiol Clamp

    Infusion of IGF-I suppresses and experimental reduction of IGF-I concentrations stimulates pulsatile GH secretion by approximately 2-fold.

    “infusion of IGF-I suppresses and experimental reduction of IGF-I concentrations stimulates pulsatile GH secretion by approximately 2-fold (26,27).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [26] Veldhuis, 2002, Impact of experimental blockade of peripheral growth hormone (GH) receptors on the kinetics of endogenous and exogenous GH removal in healthy women and men., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [27] Keenan, 2003, Cortisol feedback state governs adrenocorticotropin secretory-burst shape, frequency and mass in a dual-waveform construct: time-of-day dependent regulation, Am J Physiol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Continuous sc GHRP-2 infusion for 1 month stimulates GH secretion by 2-fold more in older estrogen-replaced women than comparably aged men.

    “continuous sc GHRP-2 infusion for 1 month stimulates GH secretion by 2-fold more in older estrogen-replaced women than comparably aged men (63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Bowers, 2004, Sustained elevation of pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5 concentrations during 30-day continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing peptide-2 in older men and women., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The new analytical platform was developed to permit potentially asymmetric secretory bursts and ensure valid discrimination among simultaneous and highly correlated contributions to a hormone-concentration profile.

    “Specifically, the new analytical platform was developed to permit potentially asymmetric (rather than exclusively Gaussian) secretory bursts and ensure valid discrimination among simultaneous and highly correlated contributions to a hormone-concentration profile.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The deconvolution solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    L-arginine inhibits SS release in the experimental animal and inferentially in the human.

    “although l-arginine inhibits SS release in the experimental animal and inferentially in the human (1)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Giustina, 1998, Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human., Endocr Rev source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    E2 supplementation in postmenopausal women augments stimulation by GHRP-2 and submaximal drive by GHRH.

    “clinical investigations indicate that E 2 supplementation in postmenopausal women augments stimulation by GHRP-2 and submaximal drive by GHRH”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [33] Veldhuis, 2003, Estradiol supplementation enhances submaximal feed-forward drive of growth hormone (GH) secretion by recombinant human GH-releasing hormone-1,44-amide in a putatively somatostatin-withdrawn milieu., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [39] Veldhuis, 2004, Estradiol supplementation modulates growth hormone (GH) secretory-burst waveform and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I-enforced suppression of endogenously driven GH release in postmenopausal women., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [44] Anderson, 2001, Short-term estradiol supplementation augments growth hormone (GH) secretory responsiveness to dose-varying GH-releasing peptide infusions in healthy postmenopausal women., J Clin Endocrinol Metab

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [45] Bray, 2001, Short-term estradiol replacement in postmenopausal women selectively mutes somatostatin’s dose-dependent inhibition of fasting growth hormone secretion., J Clin Endocrinol Metab

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [46] Anderson, 2001, Estradiol supplementation selectively relieves GH’s autonegative feedback on GH-releasing peptide-2-stimulated GH secretion., J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The present methodology predicts that physiological compared with low concentrations of E2 determine not only the mass of GH secretory bursts but also their inferred waveform.

    “The resultant methodology predicts that physiological compared with low concentrations of E 2 determine not only the mass of GH secretory bursts but also their inferred waveform (Fig. 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The deconvolution solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The present analyses do not address the effects of prolonged dual-secretagogue stimulation under E2-clamped conditions.

    “First, the present analyses do not address the effects of prolonged dualsecretagogue stimulation under E 2 -clamped conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
12 of 12
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density).

    “The basic assumptions are that observed concentration peaks reflect the mass contained in a flexible secretory-burst waveform (three-parameter generalized gamma probability density);”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics.

    “combined diffusion, advection, and irreversible elimination proceed via biexponential kinetics;”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The deconvolution solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times.

    “and the solution is statistically conditioned on a priori estimates of pulse-onset times, as previously described”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The minimal analytical model of reciprocal interactions among GHRH, GHRP, and SS is a valid representation of the hypothalamopituitary system.

    “According to a minimal analytical model of reciprocal interactions among GHRH, GHRP, and SS, the foregoing outcomes may be unified under the most frugal hypothesis that E 2 potentiates the combined hypothalamopituitary actions of GHRP.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Placebo testosterone variability exceeds the stated maximum

    Minor

    For five placebo subjects with a mean testosterone concentration of 17 ng/dl and no value above 22 ng/dl, the reported standard error of 4.7 ng/dl is impossible. Even if concentrations could be zero, the largest possible standard error is about 4.3 ng/dl.

  • Placebo LH variability exceeds the stated maximum

    Minor

    Among five placebo subjects, a mean LH concentration of 0.37 IU/liter with no value above 1.1 IU/liter cannot have a standard error of 0.38. Even allowing values down to zero, the largest possible standard error is about 0.23 IU/liter.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

18 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fryburg, 1997, Short-term modulation of the androgen milieu alters pulsatile but not exercise or GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in healthy men., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 82, 3710

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erickson, D., Keenan, D. M., Farhy, L., Mielke, K., Bowers, C. Y., & Veldhuis, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
1741-1751
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1990803534
Cited by
21
References
92
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic (RR00585)
  • National Institutes of Health (RR-00585)
  • National Institute on Aging (RR00585, R01AG014799)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00585, M01RR000585)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K25HD001474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
growth hormone secretion, estradiol, premenopausal women, secretagogues, L-arginine, GHRP-2, growth hormone-releasing hormone, visceral fat, GnRH agonist, insulin-like growth factor I, testosterone
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Endocrine System, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Pulsatile Flow, Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone, Premenopause, Human Growth Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review