Cited by 35Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

Critical evaluation of the combined model approach for estimation of prehepatic insulin secretion

Watanabe, Richard M., Steil, Garry M., Bergman, Richard N.·1998·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

The combined model approach uses kinetic analysis of both plasma insulin and C-peptide dynamics to estimate prehepatic insulin secretion rates and parameters of insulin and C-peptide kinetics. The original model used single-compartment kinetics to describe both insulin and C-peptide despite knowledge that C-peptide follows two-compartment kinetics. The performance of the model under rapidly changing secretory conditions has come into question. Thus a more complex combined model is introduced, incorporating two-compartmental C-peptide disappearance. The addition of two-compartment C-peptide kinetics required a novel numerical approach to allow estimation of model parameters. This simulation study was undertaken to 1) compare the performance of the original combined model and 2) examine the numerical method used to identify parameters for the extended combined model with two-compartment C-peptide kinetics under simulated conditions of rapidly changing insulin and C-peptide. Monte Carlo simulation revealed that the original combined model does not provide accurate estimates of prehepatic insulin secretion under rapid kinetics. However, the extended combined model provides accurate reconstruction of prehepatic insulin secretory profile without separate quantification of C-peptide kinetics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1998.274.1.e172

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watanabe, R. M., Steil, G. M., & Bergman, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
274
Issue
1
Pages
E172-E183
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2156712503
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG0-0093)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG000042, T32 HG00042)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32DK009525, F32 DK09525)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
C-peptide kinetics, combined model, parameter estimation
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Animals, C-Peptide, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Kinetics, Liver, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Monte Carlo Method, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review